Page 11 of 15 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 149

Thread: Valve & Intel Work On Open-Source GPU Drivers

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    44

    Default

    The last thing in the world I would feel from an Apple product is peace of mind.

  2. #102
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    769

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jvillain View Post
    The last thing in the world I would feel from an Apple product is peace of mind.
    But they're magical.

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    319

    Default

    A lot of these problems mirror issues that we've seen with other game engines (e.g., Unigine).
    I'm sure they kinda loled and ignore them, 'cause they're just some russian dudes, right? But when the big boys at Valve cometh... things... are... different

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 89c51 View Post
    I don't think Valve is a "make or brake" factor for desktop linux.

    Linux has its own problems that make it "difficult" for the average user + you have to have something that might make them take notice. Freedom is not one of the things that will attract for sure. Techical advance either. Apple managed to attract people with beauty and the promise of peace of mind (just works etc.).
    I think you're wrong, Valve can do damage to Linux if they fail. They will be an example for other companies not to follow. They will think: wow Valve such a big company and they failed, we will probably fail too so we better stay out of Linux.

    I think we should contact other companies now and tell them that Valve is porting Steam and games to Linux and they should follow them before seeing the end result of Valve's endeavour.

    I just hope that all the games ported to Linux can be played on older distributions, in my case Ubuntu 10.10 - latest with Gnome 2.32.
    Btw, fuck Gnome3, GTK3, Arch linux, Debian, Mark Shuttleworth and software patents.

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    754

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael View Post
    there's likely no hope for the Linux desktop ever going truly mainstream and posing serious competition to Windows on the desktop.
    I don't see Linux (or anything else) really posing serious competition to Windows on the desktop, I'd love to be wrong though but seriously it's pre-installed in just about every consumer-pc out there and I don't see that changing.

    On the other hand I don't see why Linux has to pose serious competition to Windows on the desktop, it's NOT as if the Linux desktop can 'break'.

    If this new game push by Valve fails to gain traction, the Linux desktop will continue to chug along and slooowly increase it's market share just as it already is, if Valve succeeds I don't think for a second that it will pose a serious threath to the Windows desktop, even Apple with all their billions at their disposal haven't been able to do so, however it will make it alot nicer for those of us using Linux and it will certainly get more people onto Linux due to lowering the barrier of entry, but nowhere near enough for Microsoft to start sweating.

    Again that's just my personal cynical/realist view, I would dance a jig if I was wrong and Linux gained massive desktop market share, but I just don't see it, not unless Microsoft would effectively abandon the desktop outright to start chasing Apple in some 'pad' goosechase but not even Ballmer could be that stupid... right?

    So, for those of us already using Linux on our desktop, and those on the fence considering a switch to Linux, what Valve is pursuing could indeed have huge impact on our desktop experience so it's certainly exciting times ahead. Meanwhile looking past the desktop, Linux future couldn't be brighter in my opinion so if we are strictly talking 'Linux', it's already a incredible success.

  6. #106
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    769

    Default

    I think Linux would have to provide some sort of advantage (other than cost) to bring people over, but it's possible. E.g., the HPC sector has gravitated around Linux because it's extremely customizable. So maybe there's some advantage that can be exploited for better gaming (low latency kernel, network stack, whatever... I'm not competent enough to know), then you could certainly get the more hardcore gamers to come over, provided other things are in place (games of course, and hardware / driver support, and non-retarded broken applications / desktop environments). Eventually that could build hype and momentum that draws over some less-hardcore gamers as well, since they tend to follow what the pros do.

    It seems it's less a question of what Valve can do for Linux, and more about what the Linux community can do to make Valve's ventures (and those of other game developers) successful and as smooth as possible.

    It has to be better than the status quo to get people to switch.

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    400

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Danny3 View Post
    I think you're wrong, Valve can do damage to Linux if they fail. They will be an example for other companies not to follow. They will think: wow Valve such a big company and they failed, we will probably fail too so we better stay out of Linux.

    I think we should contact other companies now and tell them that Valve is porting Steam and games to Linux and they should follow them before seeing the end result of Valve's endeavour.

    I just hope that all the games ported to Linux can be played on older distributions, in my case Ubuntu 10.10 - latest with Gnome 2.32.
    Btw, fuck Gnome3, GTK3, Arch linux, Debian, Mark Shuttleworth and software patents.
    11.04 is the last ubuntu with Gnome 2.32, new uses will default to unit but you can switch it on the log in screen (i will remember your preferences) 10.10 is out of support so don't bed on any thing coming to it. 11.04 will be EOL in October then you cold move to 10.04 that should have you going until April. Have fun.

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    289

    Default

    Seeing as how Valve has been keeping track of Wine users on Steam for a long time now, they must already have some idea of an expected user base. However much it is, they must think it worthwhile.

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    734

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by benmoran View Post
    Seeing as how Valve has been keeping track of Wine users on Steam for a long time now, they must already have some idea of an expected user base. However much it is, they must think it worthwhile.
    Agreed. But how do they differentiate or separate Linux+Wine users from Windows users? If they are using the same Steam client?

    So how do they know the percetange of Linux users vs Windows users if they are using the same client?

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,858

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asdx View Post
    Agreed. But how do they differentiate or separate Linux+Wine users from Windows users? If they are using the same Steam client?

    So how do they know the percetange of Linux users vs Windows users if they are using the same client?
    The Windows Steam client explicity asks for the Wine version string. A native Windows will report nothing, but wine exposes this information if the app requests it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •