People incorrectly assume that AMD drivers suck. They don't.

[ruinairas]

Despite the fact that AMD drivers might not suck....I cannot get it to work correctly on any type of AMD APU without serious issues. A good example is video corruption, slowness, and it freezes a lot. If I leave my laptop with a AMD APu 3400m on the table for more than 5 minutes idle it completely locks up. Whereas my desktop which is using a NVIDIA Geforce GTX 550 TI has NEVER had this issue. I can leave it on for days on end. It just "works" I'm not exactly sure whats going wrong..but all I know is with my own experience the APU's just don't "work" the way they should..on Both 12.04 and 12.10 (current). I'd sure like someone to prove me wrong though. Is there some kind of fix? I do after all want to see ALL graphics cards work properly..not just one individual.

[xgt001]

Despite the fact that AMD drivers might not suck....I cannot get it to work correctly on any type of AMD APU without serious issues. A good example is video corruption, slowness, and it freezes a lot. If I leave my laptop with a AMD APu 3400m on the table for more than 5 minutes idle it completely locks up. Whereas my desktop which is using a NVIDIA Geforce GTX 550 TI has NEVER had this issue. I can leave it on for days on end. It just "works" I'm not exactly sure whats going wrong..but all I know is with my own experience the APU's just don't "work" the way they should..on Both 12.04 and 12.10 (current). I'd sure like someone to prove me wrong though. Is there some kind of fix? I do after all want to see ALL graphics cards work properly..not just one individual.

We see these issues every Catalyst release for APU's and AMD seems to be ignoring these APU's on Linux side atleast which is kinda stupid considering how aggressively they publicize it. Every Catalyst release, there seems to be no improvement on the APU side , atleast from what I read in the forums.

[Dandel]

Despite the fact that AMD drivers might not suck....I cannot get it to work correctly on any type of AMD APU without serious issues. A good example is video corruption, slowness, and it freezes a lot. If I leave my laptop with a AMD APu 3400m on the table for more than 5 minutes idle it completely locks up. Whereas my desktop which is using a NVIDIA Geforce GTX 550 TI has NEVER had this issue. I can leave it on for days on end. It just "works" I'm not exactly sure whats going wrong..but all I know is with my own experience the APU's just don't "work" the way they should..on Both 12.04 and 12.10 (current). I'd sure like someone to prove me wrong though. Is there some kind of fix? I do after all want to see ALL graphics cards work properly..not just one individual.

I have experience with that chip. I have never had any of the issues You mentioned with mine... Care to clearly state the Brand, the Model, and Model number for this laptop? The issue might have more to do with the vendor, or out of date bios.

[hoohoo]

Indeed, one can hope we'll some day be able to get everything working out-of-the-box, though let's be realistic here.
Also, given all the codecs and third party stuff one has to cram in their box... What exactly is "basic media functionality"?

Not to mention the encumbrance of so many codecs!

[Panix]

Update: JIC, anyone cares, I can't get the Thinkpad T500 to properly go in sleep mode and I even tried changing the settings in the BIOS. There's three options:

Integrated graphics - i.e. (I assume) using the Intel graphics (X4500)
ATI - Radeon HD 3650 graphics
Switchable graphics

I'm not sure whether the switchable graphics option would work but maybe it's working (in theory) nowadays?

Is there any way to fix this problem? Perhaps, the xorg config file has to be created or edited? I didn't think one had to do this STILL but whenever the laptop lid goes down, it DOES WORK more than half the time. It's strange, too. The first time, it seemed to work as the screen would materialize and I'd get the log-in screen. But, try it again and the laptop screen goes blank and the 'sleep' LED continues to blink forever.

This laptop is how many years old? Sorry, I think this is crazy that this *isn't* JUST WORKING. I don't know if the experience would be any different with any other distro but the OS is Debian Wheezy using Gnome3. Although, Mint and LMDE has been tested using the default and KDE desktop, respectfully. No difference. Same experience.

[Kano]

If you want to use fglrx you need to use the 12-6 legacy, it is in experimental. Thats clear or not? I would just disable it and set it to intel and forget about that crap.

[Panix]

If you want to use fglrx you need to use the 12-6 legacy, it is in experimental. Thats clear or not? I would just disable it and set it to intel and forget about that crap.

It's clear but the Intel card was enabled previously in the BIOS with no real difference. I did check Synaptic and both the Intel and radeon driver is enabled, I believe. Should one be 'uninstalled or something?" I didn't think it would be a factor as it should detect which one it can use (which is enabled in the BIOS?)?

I've googled but haven't found any real solution or anything up-to-date.

[nej_simon]

"Crashes, graphic corruption and really slow" is *slightly* more specific. Would be better with a list including affected program, distro, graphics card, fglrx version etc.
As for the blame-game, I actually am of a different opinion: I see no reason why AMD should pour man-hours into their drivers to fix someone else's mess. They already have their hands full. And if anyone has issues with the OpenGL specs (too complex, obscure and what not), they should take them to the Khronos group, not AMD.
Now before I get jumped: there are most probably bugs in fglrx, like in any piece of software, especially of that complexity. BUT I really find people's habit of jumping to conclusions on how every problem has to be caused by fglrx "because it works with XYZ" totally disingenuous. Which is what that Slashdot entry is about.

Let me give you a car analogy.

Let’s say you work at a taxi company. This company buys their cars from three different brands; Intel, Nvidia and AMD, and when you get to work you are assigned a car from one of these brands.

The Intel cars are not very fast but they are cheap and don’t use much gas. Intel is also open about how they work so the company’s mechanics can fix any problems that arise. From experience you know that they are reliable.

The Nvidia cars are expensive and fast. Nvidia has obfuscated their design so you can’t fix them yourself but Nvidia’s mechanics does regular maintenance work on the cars so this isn’t a problem mostly. These cars tend to be reliable too.

But sometimes you are assigned a car from AMD. These cars are expensive and are supposed to be fast like the Nvidia cars but from experience you know that their performance can be very unreliable. Sometimes they are even slower than the Intel cars. They also have frequent problems. Sometimes the engine just stops, sometimes the transmission breaks down, sometimes the electrical system fries. In fact you can’t remember ever using an AMD car without having problems. AMD’s mechanics does do maintenance work on the cars but they usually end up having the same problems again and again.

After working there for a few years and talking to other taxi drivers with similar experiences you have come to the conclusion that AMD cars suck. But when you go online to talk about it on car forums you are told that AMD cars does not suck because they follow some specifications better than Nvidia and Intel (that you, as an end user, know nothing about). And then you’re told that the roads around here aren’t good enough and you need higher quality gas that doesn't seem to be avilable anywhere (the other brands doesn't seem to have any problems with this however).

Would that make you change your mind on AMD cars? I certainly wouldn't.

[curaga]

In true slashdot style, let's discuss the car analogy

Intel cars _are_ expensive, because they always come bundled with a trailer, whether you want it or not.

Nvidia cars often heat up enough to leave you on the road.

And to sum it up, reviews are often paid for by one of them. So pick your poison.

[RussianNeuroMancer]

The Intel cars are not very fast but they are cheap and don’t use much gas. Intel is also open about how they work so the company’s mechanics can fix any problems that arise. From experience you know that they are reliable.

Exept a lot of laptops with Intel GMA3600 (there is semi-broken EGL/GLES-only driver) and still not fixed tearing issues on SB and IB.

Nvidia has obfuscated their design so you can’t fix them yourself but Nvidia’s mechanics does regular maintenance work on the cars so this isn’t a problem mostly.

Do you even visit nvnews forum? There a lot of problems with nVidia driver.

In fact you can’t remember ever using an AMD car without having problems.

I can't remember using Intel or nVidia GPU without problems. So what?

AMD’s mechanics does do maintenance work on the cars but they usually end up having the same problems again and again.

Just for example few latest nVidia proprietary driver releases nVidia fix and broke sleep and TV switch few times. Yeah, nVidia end up having the same problems again and again too.

And to sum it up, reviews are often paid for by one of them. So pick your poison.

nVidia don't need to pay, they just provide Right List Of Games (For Right Review Results) with early hardware samples. So journalists have no choice but use nVidia's games list in review otherwise they doesn't get early hardware samples. As simple as that.