Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 9101112 LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 115

Thread: People incorrectly assume that AMD drivers suck. They don't.

  1. #101

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RussianNeuroMancer View Post
    broke sleep and TV switch few times.
    Slowfix: I mean VT switch.

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    484

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nej_simon View Post
    And then you’re told that the roads around here aren’t good enough and you need higher quality gas that doesn't seem to be avilable anywhere (the other brands doesn't seem to have any problems with this however).
    That's where the analogy is flawed. It's more like a bunch of people, who come up with characteristics on how the roads should be built and what chemical composition gas should have, decided one thing to accomodate sedans. AMD builds sedans based on that, but road constructors and gas refiners seem to be content with looser qualities because historically people have used nvidias diesel SUVs. And drivers complain about how sedans are junk.

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PsynoKhi0 View Post
    That's where the analogy is flawed. It's more like a bunch of people, who come up with characteristics on how the roads should be built and what chemical composition gas should have, decided one thing to accomodate sedans. AMD builds sedans based on that, but road constructors and gas refiners seem to be content with looser qualities because historically people have used nvidias diesel SUVs. And drivers complain about how sedans are junk.
    I think you missunderstood the point of my analogy. The point is that the average user does not care about whatever the reason a company's products has constant issues. So what if the roads and gas are made for different specifications? It doesn't matter! From the user perspective the cars from that company suck because they have issues being used with the roads and gas that's available now.

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    346

    Default

    what does the pope-mobile run on i wonder...

  5. #105

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hoohoo View Post
    The only problem I've ever had with AMD video drivers on Linux is a tendency to tearing in video.
    So, you probably never clicked here then . (Non gallium users should instead see this).

    Every driver has its problem, but yes, the open drivers are generally a better choice on Linux.

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    115

    Default Invalid.

    Quote Originally Posted by oibaf View Post
    So, you probably never clicked here then . (Non gallium users should instead see this).

    Every driver has its problem, but yes, the open drivers are generally a better choice on Linux.
    AMD driver fails your Mozilla webGL demo I take it (I'm at work using an NV box), thus open drivers are generally better?

    I say non sequiter.

    Also moving the goal posts, unless you claim there are no tests or demos that the open drivers fail.

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    9

    Default

    I like coming here.



  8. #108
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by D0pamine View Post
    what does the pope-mobile run on i wonder...
    The pope-mobile runs on Jesus's Love!

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    346

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hoohoo View Post
    The pope-mobile runs on Jesus's Love!
    not on the tears of abused alter boys then....

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by D0pamine View Post
    not on the tears of abused alter boys then....
    No - the altar boy's tears lubricate the axles.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •