Page 1 of 35 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 346

Thread: id Software: Linux Hasn't Produced Positive Results

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,179

    Default id Software: Linux Hasn't Produced Positive Results

    Phoronix: id Software: Linux Hasn't Produced Positive Results

    While id Software was known for years as being a Linux-friendly game company with providing native ports of their in-house titles with support for the id Tech engines on Linux, this is no longer the case. John Carmack, the founder of id Software, has lost his commitment to seeing Linux support...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTE1NDA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    125

    Default Re

    I was saying the same thing since the announcement of Valve being interested in Linux.
    Linux has 1% desktop market share, from this 1% take the gamers which in Linux are just in a VERY VERY small amount.
    Now take from this gamers the ones that are ready to pay, it goes almost to 0%. Ubuntu Software Center can be as a good demonstration that almost all of the Linux users don't want to pay a cent for software.
    Linux is not a good platform for developers to make money on. And IDSoftware had to feel it on their skin. Put in a lot of effort to port and have additional expenses for nothing.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    34

    Default

    I'm waiting for that Rage more than one year, they would've made some money from me, but they did choose not to.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    148

    Default What?

    The id way:
    1. Sell games with Windows-only executable
    2. Put free (as beer) Linux executable on website
    3. HOW Linux users could "pay bills"?

    The Valve way:
    1. Sell games with Steamplay support - user (Mac/Windows/Linux) pays only once
    2. Check plaftorm statistics

    PS TTimo (only Linux-friendly man) doesn't work in id anymore...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    I really think we are seeing this new "attitude" towards linux simply because of iD's buy out. They promised business as usual but so far that has been far from the case.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwahoo View Post
    The id way:
    1. Sell games with Windows-only executable
    2. Put free (as beer) Linux executable on website
    3. HOW Linux users could "pay bills"?

    The Valve way:
    1. Sell games with Steamplay support - user (Mac/Windows/Linux) pays only once
    2. Check plaftorm statistics

    PS TTimo (only Linux-friendly man) doesn't work in id anymore...
    This, id's linux support was half-assed at best. They had like one guy doing the porting, and hid a linux binary somewhere on their site. What the hell did they expect? I expect valve to be much more successful with their approach.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    116

    Default

    I'm not one of those "this is the year of the Linux desktop" types but I do think Linux on the desktop has come a long way since 2007 when Quake Wars was released. Given a few more years of development, especially with support of Valve and a few others, Linux could become as viable as OS X for gaming. I don't think it will ever be the lead platform for a development studio.

    VT-d with VGA passthrough is enough for me at the moment anyway.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    565

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alliancemd View Post
    I was saying the same thing since the announcement of Valve being interested in Linux.
    Linux has 1% desktop market share, from this 1% take the gamers which in Linux are just in a VERY VERY small amount.
    Now take from this gamers the ones that are ready to pay, it goes almost to 0%. Ubuntu Software Center can be as a good demonstration that almost all of the Linux users don't want to pay a cent for software.
    Linux is not a good platform for developers to make money on. And IDSoftware had to feel it on their skin. Put in a lot of effort to port and have additional expenses for nothing.
    I donate to software projects I like/appreciate, and offering fun and polished games for Linux wins devs my donations. I will never buy a game from the Ubuntu Software Center, even though I usually run Ubuntu, because they don't give you a cross-distro application. Application freedom, the freedom to run your games and other programs on any Linux distro you want, is a requirement for me as I refuse to be bound to a proprietary Linux OS. If they provide straight-up normal binaries or cross-distro installers, I pay. Desura has provided those things with Oil Rush and Trine 2, so I had no problem paying for those games.

    The biggest problem on Linux that I keep saying over and over again and it seems like no one listens or cares is standards, including software installation standards. If there is any chance that a particular library you are linking to isn't a solid standard and might not be on someone's installed Linux OS, you need to include the damn thing in your installer or make it easy (automatically, preferrably) to get it.

    The most important thing for anyone's freedom in any area, hardware and software, with cars and computers and TVs and all devices, is standards. Standards = freedom, thus Linux needs more standards. I don't know why this is a hard concept for anyone who cares about openness and freedom to grasp. Instead, Canonical wants their own Apple iStore, as does Microsoft, to lock users to their platform and their platform only. None of them will get my money because of that (among other factors).

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alliancemd View Post
    I was saying the same thing since the announcement of Valve being interested in Linux.
    Linux has 1% desktop market share, from this 1% take the gamers which in Linux are just in a VERY VERY small amount.
    Now take from this gamers the ones that are ready to pay, it goes almost to 0%. Ubuntu Software Center can be as a good demonstration that almost all of the Linux users don't want to pay a cent for software.
    Linux is not a good platform for developers to make money on. And IDSoftware had to feel it on their skin. Put in a lot of effort to port and have additional expenses for nothing.
    Numbers from http://www.humblebundle.com/ prove you wrong, the population of Linux gamers is almost as big as Mac ones, but interestingly they tend to pay more than Mac and Windows community. It makes me believe there is a market waiting to be discovered.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    225

    Default

    He also thinks the PC is no longer a prime gaming platform, and all games in the future will be in Virtual Reality, and totally fucked up Rage.

    How the mighty have fallen.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •