gonzález being an idiot is reading all the news about apple and put the appletard blinders on so you can ignore the facts.
you are right, it's absolutely lies I just made up
Foxxconn workers are jolly, jolly happy and not a single one has committed suicide.
Apple is really nice and generous to her hardware suppliers and pays the fair price for everything
Apple doesn't pollute anything, the only by products of millions of ipads/ipods manufacturing is candy cane and sunshine.
Apple only broke that guys door and invaded his apartment because they wanted to give him a hug.
I know what you should do with your apple products but since this is a civilized forum I will restrain
(btw racist for using a comical cliche that all the jewish comedians use, the joke here is you)
Last edited by Pallidus; 08-10-2012 at 03:47 AM.
Say what the f**k you want to say, just spell my name right!
Foxconn worker suicide rate is lower than the general population in China: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foxconn_suicides
So yes, actually, working at Foxconn lowered the chance that you might kill yourself.
All computer companies pollute. Because all computer companies use components made from toxic materials. Make processors and memory chips are some of the nastiest processes in the world:
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/semiconductor/
So if you are mad at Apple and Foxconn, you should be mad at everyone who has every produced a computer. There are way more non-Apple hardware parts in landfills than the other way around.
Is Apple the only company in computing with some dirt under its fingernails? I think not. Here are a few examples:
http://www.briberylibrary.com/associ...der-the-new-u/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hewlet...spying_scandal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...s_v._Microsoft
The only one with blinders on (and blind biased hatred) is you.
And the answer to that is not to blindly label them as a perfect devil either, but to look at what they do well and what they do NOT do well, and make some truthful observations.
Neither Linux nor OSX is perfect, but each one has great strengths and great weaknesses which make them perfect for certain roles.
When I was a desktop to do actual work, I use OSX.
When I want to deploy servers, I use Linux.
When I want to play games, I use Windows.
Apple laptop hardware has been the first since some earlier Sony or IBM (NOT Lenovo) laptops which have been highly reliable for me and I didn't want to pitch in the trash after a year. 2010 17" MBP has been a reliable travel companion. Last time I felt that way about a laptop was the IBM A31p. Great screen, ran for years... tho the MBP is WAY lighter and has a much better battery than that beast did. I could use my current MBP for 3+ years without issue.
I moved to OSX for a desktop for the same reasons I abandoned Windows for real work 10 years before that. It was a better solution that allowed me to do all I wanted with less hassle. OSX is not perfect. Apple is not perfect. But for many, many cases... they offer a much better HW/SW combo with less effort than anything Linux can provide right now.
Just looking briefly, it seems like the thunderbolt display is basically a combination of displayport and PCIe. If that is the case, this isn't like implementing HDMI or DVI where there is one or a few standard data transfer formats to prepare, you are coding support for low-level device access (i.e. full, direct access to system memory) and the performance of the device will only be as good as the drivers for the device. Considering Apple's history of making their devices have as poor interoperability as possible with non-Apple software, this may be more a case of Linux developers not having access to enough of the device specs to make a good implementation. If that is the case it may be a while before Linux devs are able to reverse-engineer the device, especially considering the cost and targeting at Mac customers will likely restrict the appeal of the device.