Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910
Results 91 to 95 of 95

Thread: Running Wayland: It Works, But A Lot Of Work Remains

  1. #91
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    101

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    Never rewrite from scratch my friend...never. All that code you consider crap actually has a lot of bugfixes, the new code has a new array of problems and most likely will also repeat some bugs from the past....
    When the problem itself has changed or limitations of the current approach block further development is is often imperative to write from scratch. Don't let this get in the way of your trolling though. Change==bad, new stuff is always the wrong approach, blah blah blah.

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ShadowBane View Post
    When the problem itself has changed or limitations of the current approach block further development is is often imperative to write from scratch. Don't let this get in the way of your trolling though. Change==bad, new stuff is always the wrong approach, blah blah blah.
    Read that article from that link. Most "limitations" are limitations just because the developers like to see them as such so they can justify a rewrite.

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    220

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    In fact you sound like you have no experience : http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articl...000000069.html

    Never rewrite from scratch my friend...never. All that code you consider crap actually has a lot of bugfixes, the new code has a new array of problems and most likely will also repeat some bugs from the past....
    I have read this article already, but it has absolutely no relevance to the case of Wayland.
    The article talks about rewriting the SAME software from scratch, Wayland is a very DIFFERENT thing altogether.
    Bugfixes in Xorg don't apply to Wayland because they are fundamentally different architectures..
    how the hell am I supposed to explain that to you over and over again?

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    955

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ancurio View Post
    how the hell am I supposed to explain that to you over and over again?
    Why the hell are you trying?

    1) Click user's name.
    2) Click Add to Ignore List on the left-hand pane.
    3) Click confirmation button.
    4) Go use your new found free time to nail your better half.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    218

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    Ubuntu 12.04 that will get on more computers that usual if we listen to Mr. Shuttleworth uses 0.9.something. And 11.10 also used 0.9.something if I'm not mistaken.
    If you use Unity you should use 0.9.x as I understand it. Ubuntu is tailored to Unity uppermost, as compiz 0.9.x is to unity. If your user-case is different you can use it but should expect bugs.
    Last edited by Akka; 08-15-2012 at 02:44 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •