Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: OS X 10.8 vs. Ubuntu Linux: A Battle With No Clear Winner

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,759

    Default OS X 10.8 vs. Ubuntu Linux: A Battle With No Clear Winner

    Phoronix: OS X 10.8 vs. Ubuntu Linux: A Battle With No Clear Winner

    Since Apple released OX X 10.8 "Mountain Lion" last month, there have been tests going on at Phoronix of this latest Apple operating system not only on the Retina MacBook Pro, but other Mac hardware as well. In this article is a comparison of OS X 10.8 versus Ubuntu Linux -- when trying out both Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and the latest Ubuntu 12.10 development version.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=17801

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    389

    Default

    Linux wins at nearly everything but graphics related work. Just goes to show how far behind Linux drivers are compared to OS X.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    25

    Default

    please in your title please write that THIS TEST ITS TRUE JUST FOR MAC NOT FOR PC BECUASE YOU DONT TEST IT IN OSX AND UBUNTU IN PC!!!

    soo please please please bold that its just for MAC computers

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    239

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nir2142 View Post
    please in your title please write that THIS TEST ITS TRUE JUST FOR MAC NOT FOR PC BECUASE YOU DONT TEST IT IN OSX AND UBUNTU IN PC!!!

    soo please please please bold that its just for MAC computers
    The mac is just a PC from Apple.
    In Germany you can run legally tun OS X on a non Apple, but don't know it for the rest of the world.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    151

    Default

    I don't think SNA has been enabled in Ubuntu 12.10, yet. Since from yesterday's benchmarks, which were tested on the mac mini http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag..._intel21&num=1, the graphics performance on every benchmark went up, yet in these benchmarks we see that the graphics performance for 12.10 goes down in comparison to 12.04, which makes me believe that SNA was not enabled. If it was, then the graphics performance of linux would have been a bit better and more comparable to the OSX graphics stack.

    The upcoming OS X 10.8 vs. Microsoft Windows 7 Pro vs. Ubuntu 12.04 vs. Ubuntu 12.10 vs. Ubuntu 12.10 + Git should be more representative of linux performance vs other OS's.

    Could someone comment on this?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Dhaka,Bangladesh
    Posts
    104

    Default

    For upcoming Opengl tests, can you please do it with and without unity?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thaodan View Post
    The mac is just a PC from Apple.
    In Germany you can run legally tun OS X on a non Apple, but don't know it for the rest of the world.

    you right but its not the point if you do benchmarks it must be done in "neutral computer" you can't create benchmarks that the computer (mac) from apple and also the osx from apple its not "real" benchmarks or its not objective.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nir2142 View Post
    you right but its not the point if you do benchmarks it must be done in "neutral computer" you can't create benchmarks that the computer (mac) from apple and also the osx from apple its not "real" benchmarks or its not objective.
    What exactly do you mean?

    Michael is benchmarking the performance of Linux to the performance of OSX running on two examples of Apple hardware. True OSX is in its "native" territory and has optimizations in place to take advantage of the hardware, but Linux has other optimizations that Apple may not have considered. If benchmarks running Windows 7/8 or Solaris were included, they would have other optimizations that their respective publishers found important for the hardware at hand.

    My Apple hardware is a pc like any other that can be purchased from HP, Asus, et al. Sure the hardware can be a little pricey, but I find it extremely rugged and capable for my needs. I do not need to limit myself to running OSX and contrary to popular belief, can run any OS that supports my hardware even eliminating OSX is I desire.

    Articles like this are great to see and are the reason I keep visiting Phoronix. I see Linux as being a "neutral" platform for testing hardware, specifically, processors.
    Last edited by heinsj24; 08-25-2012 at 04:48 PM. Reason: Kudos for Phoronix

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    464

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dukenukemx View Post
    Linux wins at nearly everything but graphics related work. Just goes to show how far behind Linux drivers are compared to OS X.
    On the bright side, it shows how mature the other facets of the linux/gnu/debian stack have become.

    I am 'really' surprised by just how big the OGL performance difference is, though significant gains have been made on intel/mesa which may not yet be incorporated into U12.10.

    F

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    343

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dukenukemx View Post
    Linux wins at nearly everything but graphics related work. Just goes to show how far behind Linux drivers are compared to OS X.
    How can you be sure its driver related? NVIDIA (and I suspect other devs) uses the same base driver code for all the major OS's, so why is Linux performance THAT much worse?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •