hi marek, i did a git pull today since some patches naming r700 landed but it seem MSAA is not activated yet, i think is cuz i miss a patch that has not landed on git yet but just in case
OpenGL vendor string: X.Org
OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD RV770
OpenGL version string: 2.1 Mesa 8.1-devel (git-f8a8f06)
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30
03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI R700 [Radeon HD 4850] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
04:00.0 Display controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI R700 [Radeon HD 4850]
Btw. compared to Intel graphics... I can play DDO (wine), open driver on 1 cylinder (low power profile ~299MHz), all settings to high.
He has PayPal link in his profile (http://phoronix.com/forums/member.php?18270-marek) -- firstname.lastname@example.org.
Originally Posted by Dukenukemx
Wouldn't radeongcn have been a better name then radeonsi?
Originally Posted by bridgman
The problem is that we don't know what comes after GCN and whether it will also fit into the same driver. We kinda had two choices :
Originally Posted by Ansla
- stay with the current naming convention based on "first supported generation"
- rename existing drivers as well and go with architecture-based names
Agree that the transitional product naming (where high end SI parts are GCN and lower parts are VLIW) makes the current naming convention awkward for now.
Tags for this Thread