Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Qt Developers Reconsider MinGW For Qt 5.0

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,415

    Default Qt Developers Reconsider MinGW For Qt 5.0

    Phoronix: Qt Developers Reconsider MinGW For Qt 5.0

    While we're now up to the Qt 5.0 beta stage, Qt developers are still settling for what MinGW implementation to use for the Windows build of Qt 5.0...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTE3NDI

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,762

    Default

    I've been cross-compiling Qt from Linux to Windows for a couple of years now. That way you can use the latest GCC version without having to wait for mingw to update their Windows version of it. Works like a charm.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    492

    Default

    Yeah I was dying to find that out. Now if we could find out which version of emacs they use.
    Seriously, who cares about all that?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Adiyaman, Turkey
    Posts
    36

    Default

    Is there any reason to use the MinGW builds, since there are official VS builds available, which are more "native"?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    82

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bug77 View Post
    Seriously, who cares about all that?
    Who cares about how the world's most used cross-platform GUI framework compiles on the world's most used operating system? Err... Quite a lot of people.

    Of course, if you don't use develop for/with Qt on Windows - then why are you even reading this article?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    492

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cbamber85 View Post
    Who cares about how the world's most used cross-platform GUI framework compiles on the world's most used operating system? Err... Quite a lot of people.

    Of course, if you don't use develop for/with Qt on Windows - then why are you even reading this article?
    Maybe, but once it's released, it will be pretty obvious how it's compiled. Do we need news, months in advance, telling us that nothing is set in stone yet? I'm pretty sure anyone interested in this is following Qt mailing lists already.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    530

    Default

    I personally have a very good experience using the "unstable" 4.7 builds of mingw-w64, both 32bit and 64bit, and this includes C, C++ and QT code.
    Furthermore, mingw-w64 is an official part of Fedora 17, letting me develop and test the Windows side of my code from within Fedora (compile via mingw, test using wine) without wasting time booting the Windows XP/7 VMs unless I'm testing "final" code.

    - Gilboa
    DEV-NG: Intel S2600C0, 2xE52658V2, 32GB, 4x2TB, GTX680, F20/x86_64, Dell U2711.
    DEV: Intel S5520SC, 2xX5680, 36GB, 5x320GB, GTX550, F20/x86_64, Dell U2711 (^).
    SRV: Tyan Tempest i5400XT, 2xE5335, 8GB, 4x2TB, 9800GTX, F20/x86-64, Dell U2412.
    LAP: ASUS N56VJ, i7-3630QM, 16GB, 1TB, 635M, F20/x86_64.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •