Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: ODROID-X Continues Battling The PandaBoard ES

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,344

    Default ODROID-X Continues Battling The PandaBoard ES

    Phoronix: ODROID-X Continues Battling The PandaBoard ES

    Here's the latest benchmarks of the low-cost ODROID-X, a $129 quad-core ARM Cortex-A9 development board out of Korea with ARM Mali 400 graphics.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=17838

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Dhaka,Bangladesh
    Posts
    102

    Default Unity 2D removed

    As Unity 2d will be no more supported, can this boards can handle Unity 3d using software rasterizer? Michel can you please add some simple graphics benchmarks with Unity 2d and 3d in it?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    San Bernardino, CA
    Posts
    231

    Default

    ODROID-X vs. Atom N2800 please! =)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,006

    Default

    Too bad it doesn't got Gigabit Ethernet and USB 3.0.

    btw the Cubieboard is only $49.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Vigo, Spain
    Posts
    38

    Default

    Does anybody know where can I find the odroid-x ubuntu image, or any documentation on installing ubuntu in a sd card for odroid?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    32

    Default Odroid X vs N2800

    Quote Originally Posted by gururise View Post
    ODROID-X vs. Atom N2800 please! =)

    I found this (Exynos, no 7zip test, and atom N2800 only pass x264 and 7zip test) :
    http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...SU-1208231AR85
    http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...AR-INTELATOM08

    x264 then :
    Atom N2800 (cedarview 4 cores@1.8GHz) : 11.65 fps
    Exynos 4412 HardFP (cortex A9 4 cores@1.4GHz) : 10.01 fps
    Exynos 4412 SoftFP (cortex A9 4 cores@1.4GHz) : 4.72 fps

    11.65 / 1.8 = 6.472
    10.01 / 1.4 = 7.15
    Well, Atom is less good / Mhz. Some other Cortex A9 (like really cheap Rockchip, or HiVision (Huawei), Qualcomm Snapdragon S4) come in public products, this month at 1.6 and more Ghz. Both consume far less energy than atom and are less expansive.

    7zip:
    Atom N2800 (cedarview 4 cores@1.8GHz) : 2164
    Exynos 4412 Softfp (cortex A9 4 cores@1.4GHz) : 946

    When 7zip work in HardFP on Exynos 4412, with simple equation (HardFP vs SoftFP ratio >2), that is rough extrapolation, it should be equal than Atom N2800 with lower frequency.
    Last edited by Popolon; 09-05-2012 at 04:05 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    32

    Default

    When 7zip work in HardFP on Exynos 4412, with simple equation (HardFP vs SoftFP ratio >2), that is rough extrapolation, it should be equal than Atom N2800 with lower frequency.
    oops this is stupid, 7zip should is pure integer. But ASM optimization for arm are only on CRC in the 7zip stable sourcecode, and there aer x86 asm optipimization for other parts. The comparison is not really fair for now.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    290

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by uid313 View Post
    Too bad it doesn't got Gigabit Ethernet and USB 3.0.

    btw the Cubieboard is only $49.
    ... Its .. Its ... perfect! Sata + ARM + HDMI for $50!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    San Bernardino, CA
    Posts
    231

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uid313 View Post
    Too bad it doesn't got Gigabit Ethernet and USB 3.0.

    btw the Cubieboard is only $49.
    Not a bad little board for $49! But the ODROID-X is quad core Cortex A9 vs single core Cortex A8 of the Cubieboard. The ODROID-X also runs at a higher freq. and has more expansion options. I guess if you are okay with much much slower performance, the Cubieboard for $49 is a pretty good deal.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •