Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 97

Thread: AMD Catalyst For Linux On The "Blacklist Of Junk"

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,770

    Default AMD Catalyst For Linux On The "Blacklist Of Junk"

    Phoronix: AMD Catalyst For Linux On The "Blacklist Of Junk"

    While the Catalyst Linux graphics driver was overhauled five years ago, not everyone is satisfied with the closed-source AMD Radeon Linux graphics driver. Here's some interesting comments by a prominent Linux developer and his less than stellar Catalyst experience...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTE3Nzc

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    945

    Default

    Considering that KWin sucks with fglrx I can probably guess who this is...

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by devius View Post
    Considering that KWin sucks with fglrx I can probably guess who this is...
    And if you think it's Martin (KWin), your guess is wrong.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,273

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael View Post
    And if you think it's Martin (KWin), your guess is wrong.
    Dave Airlie?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    14

    Default Composite Manager

    Anyone that did write a Composite Manager will say the same. Even NVidia driver have bug when run for days in a composite manager (but they are by far the best we have at the moment). Intel it's power management and compositing that don't live well together. But AMD/ATI, it's just another of crappyness. You will get so many bug report from their users, that it's just a good idea to stop bothering and blacklist their driver. Driver are maybe going better for games, but compositor is another story. If you want something stable and fast, you will be better with your own software scenegraph backend.

    And I know exactly who did send this mail. He will surely release some Window/Composite Manager by the end of the year and people have been speaking about this for sometimes now :-)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Soo... let me get this straight: 2 f*king years ago, some unnamed developer said fglrx was bad. And now, Michael posts an "article" claiming the driver is on a "blacklist of junk".

    Very solid piece of journalism Michael, well done...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    150

    Default

    The open source radeon and nouveau gallium drivers, as well as the open source Intel drivers should also qualify for this blacklist. The Intel drivers for Linux has worse OpenGL support than the Windows driver, especially GLSL. But it handles old style OpenGL fine and reasonable stability. Fglrx has very good features on paper, but generally fail to deliver. Fglrx has general GLSL and OpenCL stability issues, and has a semi-featured configuration utility. Its like a product which is almost ready for shipping, with a lot of potential but missing the final touch to make it a finished product. Compared to Intel (Linux), Fglrx has more support and does GLSL better, but the end user experience would depend on usage. But for modern OpenGL, Fglrx is still way better than Intel (Linux). The Radeon and Nouveau gallium drivers has still way worse OpenGL support than Fglrx, and has a very variable stability from release to release.

    Michael:
    This is just a suggestion, but it would be great if your reviews in the future could include more information regarding the frame rate and potential stuttering. Average frame rates is not everything, especially now as both Nvidia and AMD are adding boost which "only" improves the maximum frame rates which raises the average frame rate. And regarding stuttering, even the good Nvidia drivers does from time to time have a release with some X Server bugs which makes games lag, especially during a lot of IO events (e.g. mouse movement). An average frame measurement would not be able to detect these kinds of problems.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    16

    Default

    fglrx is much better now except with fedora which is full crap anyway.

    ciaooo

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    291

    Default

    No.. it might have improved on newer cards but it still is quite terrible on my radeon 4200 with the latest version that will run. Works fine for 2d but texturing is wonky in wine... Mesa works fine however and even allows greater dx versions to be used than fglrx.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    828

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by efikkan View Post
    The open source radeon and nouveau gallium drivers, as well as the open source Intel drivers should also qualify for this blacklist.
    just dont say such stupid stuff. you absolutate speed and feature set, thats retarded. there is more than this 2 categories out there.

    So if you are a developer of a opengl 4.0 game or something yes you will stick this other drivers that do not work for you at all on this list. but thats not the only point how you can judge a driver.

    They are more way more stable than the closed ones and they are free, and they are fast enough for 3d desktop. So for all people who not want to play under linux because there are anyway no high grafics opensource games, and even this source-engin2 games are that crappy 10 year old grafics quality that it will even run with the intel-igps...

    so yes for commercial game developers you can maybe if you make really high quality (graphics wise) games blacklist this drivers, but for the 99% of the other people you cant.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •