For those people without a Radeon GPU can you explain what happens?
Originally Posted by Kano
I think it's heartening how much improvement there's been.
On the other hand, basing feature support on a process name is likely something that you can never really live down.
I've been using fglrx with a 7770 for several months now and only have 4 complaints, none dealbreakers.
1. Tearing, but only in movies (It's not noticeable in the games I play, whereas it is really noticeable in movies). I also understand this is related to x11 architecture more than GPU/driver and that Wayland will finally make it so that it can be truely fixed?
2. Antialiasing. I'm not sure that it works at all in some applications. (Main reason I want GPU comparisons and reviews to include still screenshots that are 'diffed', or at least layered, so to speak.)
3. Video decode accel -- just make the stupid thing use VDPAU or VAAPI out of the box.
4. Fan control.
Also, I must be lucky as I haven't had any crazy issues with Wine, though I also mostly use it for stuff from GOG.
Whoever that guy is, based on that argument he must be very stupid.
If anyones intends using a mid to top of range graphics card, primarily on linux, and with a closed 'blob' driver then just go Nvidia and save yourself the pain.
I made the mistake of going AMD with a 4870 in 2008. Partly on the back of this article.
The catlyst driver turned out to be very very poor. I gave up after a few driver revisions and sold the card on ebay.
Back with Nvidia since and I can't think of any issues other than a short wait for the driver to catch up with a bleeding edge kernel from time to time.
Blacklist Of Junk sums it up perfectly.
Yep FGLRX still sucks
I agree that fglrx drivers are laughably bad. I've since moved to the Radeon which is good but slow. oh well better than just broken.
diff -uN glxinfo wine_glxinfo:
Originally Posted by devius
-OpenGL vendor string: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
+OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc.
Originally Posted by efikkan
Don't say anything that you haven't tested yourself.
1) TeraOnline(Unreal3) doesn't play with Catalyst nor with R600 Driver, nor with HD4600 nor with HD6900 on WINE. Plays well with Nvidia Closed Drivers and GTX275 or GTX460, and i haven't tested Intel.
2) CSS(orange box) crashes with Catalyst after you enter a closed area like a house (stack overflow in graphics!!! if you believe it!!!). Plays well with Nvidia Closed Driver, Intel Open Driver, and R600 Driver!!!
3) PCSX2 emulator runs 30% faster with R600 Driver instead of Catalyst!!! wile it runs 200% faster with Nvidia Closed Driver. Core2DuoSSSE3@3ghz and HD4670 =Unplayable PCSX2, wile Nvidia 9600 and [email protected] =Playable. I haven't tested Intel.
4) With Catalyst there is not a chance to bypass Flickering in 2D mode of a desktop, the Anti-flickering option destroys Video for good.
The only good equipment for Linux for now, is a SSE4.2+(7.5+Drystone) CPU (even a cheap one for 50box), and an Nvidia Cuda GPU (as newer as better, wile flops are less important, but important). If you are not a gamer then give your money to Intel and their Open Efforts.
The catalyst drivers suck ass.
I don't give a crap how much faster people tell me, or whatever feature is missing or, or how they swear up and down that they are not terrible or that it's the application's fault or whatever BS excuse they come up with... they are just miserable.
Out of all the possible driver and video card combinations a person may want to run out there..
open source intel
closed source nvidia
closed source ATI
open source nvidia
open source ATI..
ATI closed source driver is easily the WORST possible choice for people wanting to use GL graphics on Linux. The alternatives are just so much better that it's not even funny.
It's annoying because I really want to support AMD's open source efforts, but I want to build a gaming rig that actually works, without weird driver problems (except a few in OS X I'm prepared to deal with, given that I'm going with an asrock mainboard instead of gigabyte to save some money-- the BF Prodigy is mini-itx)..
Right now it looks like the 660Ti for me. I feel guilty, but.. yeah...