Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: GameTree Linux Isn't Growing (Cedega)

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,911

    Default GameTree Linux Isn't Growing (Cedega)

    Phoronix: GameTree Linux Isn't Growing (Cedega)

    Back in January of 2011 it was announced that TransGaming would be retiring Cedega, the proprietary software formerly known as WineX that began as a fork of the MIT-licensed Wine. Cedega was to be succeeded by GameTree Linux, but this new TransGaming project hasn't been making much headway...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTE3OTI

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    20

    Default

    I tried Cedega and WineX a long time ago, but ended up with CrossOver and eventually Wine instead, since Cedega wouldn't work with one of my games. Cedega is meant for end users, and users shouldn't have to install developer tools like GameTree to get access to Cedega. Treating users like developers is one of the main complaints holding back Linux.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    828

    Default

    It's one of the many phoronix articles where something failed and forgotten but phoronix still brings it up for a dramatic story.
    Last edited by mark45; 09-08-2012 at 10:45 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    989

    Default

    I remember many years ago successfully using Cedega to run certain games that wouldn't run at all on Wine due to lack of proper Direct3D support. The last game I ever tried on Cedega was Guild Wars, and after a few builds it worked pretty well. I still wouldn't recommend them to anyone, though: instead of using the same license as current Wine and collaborating with Codeweavers, they went proprietary after forking a very, very old version of Wine.

    They're a bad, bad company that thinks they know something about how to run a business, but really, they are clueless. Looks like they're headed into $0 value territory. Good for them.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Now, they do games for the fourth phone providers in france (and tv by phone) with the name of gametree. So don't think they don't have money, they just don't care about linux, they care about money.
    (And all their games curiously work fine with wine.)

    Links: http://gametreetv.com

    Links (in french):
    http://www.numerama.com/magazine/186...eux-video.html
    http://www.universfreebox.com/article17200.html

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Rural Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,030

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Article
    If you are looking to run some Windows game binaries on Linux, you're best off using Wine and/or CodeWeavers' CrossOver. At least with Valve coming to Linux and other game publishers following, hopefully in the coming years Linux gaming will reach a point where using these Windows binary compatibility layers will become rare.
    I'll drink to that!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1

    Default

    I used to be a Cedega customer for about two years, and with supported games it worked better than CrossOver. It's D3D wrapped had features CrossOver still misses today. But they couldn't keep up with development. Cedega codebase was patchwork, and that was obvious. Most people were not willing to pay for Cedega. There were about 5 to 10 active customers in the forums, which is nothibg a company could exist from. When the official games database closed and Unofficial Transgaming Wiki, a large user created games database ceased from opening new account I took over the wiki (http://ww.cedegawiki.net/) and kept it running till today. But there were litte cotributions since then. So I think people just didn't use Cedega, and thats why TransGaming decided to stop putting efforts into it. The GameTree Linux developer program is nothing more than a graveyard for Cedega.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •