Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: Xfce 4.12 Planned For March, GTK3 Still Uncertain

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    137

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    106

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    389

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ncopa View Post
    That's a lot.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    681

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ncopa View Post
    Those numbers don't even necessarily mean worse performance. Slightly higher memory usage != slower performance unless you have a particularly low memory machine.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    San Bernardino, CA
    Posts
    225

    Default

    They really need to start supporting the newer technologies (GTK3, Gnome 3 Panel + Unity Indicators), otherwise XFCE will fall to the wayside as an alternative desktop. Whether they like it or not, most new development will occur on Gtk3, including Wayland. By sticking with an older, undeveloped toolkit, they are only hurting themselves and their users.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    San Bernardino, CA
    Posts
    225

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by elanthis View Post
    Screw them, I already ported over half their core desktop apps to GTK3 over a year ago. It took barely two evenings of coding. The git branches are still available, and they are well aware of them. They're just sticking their heads in the sand, not being cautious engineers.
    If it took you just a few evenings of coding to get half their core over to Gtk3, what is the cause of the delay?? Are they just being lazy? Is there no manpower? No interest? It seems most users are interested.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,287

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chris2kari View Post
    I can't find any technical justification for rushing like lemmings to GTK+ 3. Few app's will benefit.
    The LTS versions of the most popular distro's will be required to support GTK+ 2 for years to come.

    LXDE dev's are not in a hurry : http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp...de.pcmanfm/239
    XFCE dev's are not in a hurry : http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4...ay/029843.html
    Chromium still on GTK+ 2 for a long time : http://code.google.com/p/chromium/is...etail?id=79722

    So apart from faddism I'm at a loss to justify this heavy breathing & sweating about porting like crazy to a less mature, less memory efficient toolkit.
    Olease explain?
    Well, there are panel plugins. XFCE hasn't a lot of good plugins itself, most of the good ones are from gnome. Since gnome 2 series is already dropped, I'm pretty sure it's plugins are unmaintained.
    I'm in a dilemma about supporting migration or sticking to GTK2, since I want Wayland and updated plugins, but I'm all for performance and memory efficiency too, and GTK3 doesn't seem to care about that a lot.

    Quote Originally Posted by bwat47 View Post
    Those numbers don't even necessarily mean worse performance. Slightly higher memory usage != slower performance unless you have a particularly low memory machine.
    IIRC, XFCE is targeted to low resources computers. That means switching to a more resource hungry lib is usually a bad choice.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,394

    Default

    It would be interesting if they just ported everything to Qt5 instead Although it's highly unlikely.

    Well, they are porting things to GTK3, but at a slower pace. No need to rush, really, it's better to get everything done correctly instead of just porting as soon as possible.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    296

    Default

    Sticking with Gtk2 is the correct decision. I thought Gtk3 had technical reasons to be made, but it turns out it’s just much worse than Gtk2 on every front… 50% more memory usage is not “slightly more”… Also it’s pretty hard to find any dark Gtk3 theme at this point.
    Last edited by stqn; 09-10-2012 at 02:52 PM.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gururise View Post
    They really need to start supporting the newer technologies (GTK3, Gnome 3 Panel + Unity Indicators), otherwise XFCE will fall to the wayside as an alternative desktop.
    No, they don't actually...
    There is no pressing need to urgently dump mature, stable, memory efficent design and run with our pants down to the, apparently, one man project of GTK+ 3. The dev himself is saying it should be scrapped and work started on GTK + 4 because its so bad..

    Quote Originally Posted by gururise View Post
    Whether they like it or not, most new development will occur on Gtk3, including Wayland. By sticking with an older, undeveloped toolkit, they are only hurting themselves and their users.
    Again, Wayland is an emerging long term replacement for the X Window system and as such will someday be very nice when its finished... but there is no pressing need to run to this right this very minute for the majority of desktop users.

    I suspect people pushing this "rush rush" line are the diminishing breed of hard core desktop gamers or people with version number envy.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •