Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Unity Debacle Sets Back Ubuntu On The ARM Desktop

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,787

    Default Unity Debacle Sets Back Ubuntu On The ARM Desktop

    Phoronix: Unity Debacle Sets Back Ubuntu On The ARM Desktop

    With Unity 2D being abandoned and only providing Unity + Compiz in Ubuntu 12.10 as the default desktop, the out-of-the-box experience for low-powered ARM hardware on the stock Ubuntu desktop is a mess...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTE4MjI

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,048

    Default Unity sucks

    Unity sucks anyways.

    Get gnome-session-fallback (GNOME Classic) session.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    114

    Default

    Another example of why I prefer Qt over GTK. The Unity style launcher can be done and done well with just Qt without the need for Compiz.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dalingrin View Post
    Another example of why I prefer Qt over GTK. The Unity style launcher can be done and done well with just Qt without the need for Compiz.
    looks like Canonical don't have resources to rewrite Unity (+ they don't even think to abandon compiz)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Dhaka,Bangladesh
    Posts
    105

    Default

    I also thought that Unity on ARM will be just suck. Removing Unity 2d was another big mistake for Canonical. Removing Unity normal but keeping Unity 2d would be a lot better option.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    17

    Default

    Personally it would be far easier if Ubuntu for ARM would either come with XFCE or classic Gnome as opposed to Unity. With all the trouble involved with unity on top of the need for dedicated 3D acceleration just for a basic desktop it's pointless. ARM SoCs have limited resources to begin with and assuming they did have open source and working 3D drivers it would still be a burden on the SoC just to drive a desktop let alone whatever other process you have running or wish to run. Canonical may be making strides in supporting ARM but as for making it a useful desktop just package it without Unity and give the option during install for either classic Gnome or XFCE.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    114

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ofen View Post
    looks like Canonical don't have resources to rewrite Unity (+ they don't even think to abandon compiz)
    I don't mind that they don't have resources to maintain both. My point was that if they started with Qt then they wouldn't have needed to maintain both a GTK and Qt version. A Qt version of Unity would do everything that the GTK version can plus work well on systems without acceleration such as some ARM systems.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dalingrin View Post
    Another example of why I prefer Qt over GTK.
    GTK has nothing to do with that. Unity isn't written using GTK. Itís written in Nux.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,132

    Default

    Sam & Daniel Van Vugt are working their asses off optimizing the shit out of Compiz & Unity. I still think all the pieces will come together in time for Ubuntu 12.10. Lots of work has been done, and it will show soon.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •