Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 88

Thread: Valve's Steam Linux Beta Begins Next Week

  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Perhaps they don't want to give more than 1000 of free L4D2 copies.

    Quote Originally Posted by entropy View Post
    I wonder what's keeping them from doing a public beta after the internal one...

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Old Europe
    Posts
    936

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by narciso View Post
    Perhaps they don't want to give more than 1000 of free L4D2 copies.
    It's not clear that you can use the game beyond the beta period.
    Last edited by entropy; 09-27-2012 at 01:17 PM.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,175

    Default

    Steam on Linux is going to be awesome. I don't even want to game on Windows anymore without Steam because handling all the games, updates, friend lists, savegames etc. is such a hassle but it's even worse on Linux (imho). That all gets sorted with Steam.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,766

    Default

    One thing i am curious about is if any of the intel devs that have early access to the code tried running it with any of the other open drivers. (nouveau radeon) Just for the sake of it.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Old Europe
    Posts
    936

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by d2kx View Post
    Steam on Linux is going to be awesome. I don't even want to game on Windows anymore without Steam because handling all the games, updates, friend lists, savegames etc. is such a hassle but it's even worse on Linux (imho). That all gets sorted with Steam.
    While I mainly agree: Will I still be able to run these games in 15 years from now?
    If I want to play Dungeon Keeper, and I still do from time to time, I grab my old CD from '97 and run it flawless with DOSBox...

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by entropy View Post
    While I mainly agree: Will I still be able to run these games in 15 years from now?
    If I want to play Dungeon Keeper, and I still do from time to time, I grab my old CD from '97 and run it flawless with DOSBox...
    You should be able to, where as in the converse, using DOSBox (which is available on Linux) isn't exactly a ringing endoursement for windows, is it?

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,676

    Default

    Some old win games with 16 bit setup apps (or native 16 bit apps) will not even work with windows 9 - as there will be no 32 bit variant. For dos games you need dosbox of course - even on win if is is a newer release. Basically there are some old id games using dosbox on steam even for win, those could be easly implemented for linux - via dosbox or via native clients.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Old Europe
    Posts
    936

    Default

    Sorry, my post was actually aiming at the DRM situation.
    I must admit, mentioning DOSBox was misleading.
    The point was to say that there are good chances
    to overcome plain OS hurdles. But DRM is a different beast...
    So, will I be able to play the gems of this time
    I purchased (or rent) over Steam in say 15 years?

    Probably not...

    Obviously this concern is not actually new.
    But everytime I read statements that neglect the
    disadvantages of Steam (and other DRM platforms)
    I simply feel obliged to raise this concern (again).

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,175

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by entropy View Post
    Sorry, my post was actually aiming at the DRM situation.
    I must admit, mentioning DOSBox was misleading.
    The point was to say that there are good chances
    to overcome plain OS hurdles. But DRM is a different beast...
    So, will I be able to play the gems of this time
    I purchased (or rent) over Steam in say 15 years?

    Probably not...

    Obviously this concern is not actually new.
    But everytime I read statements that neglect the
    disadvantages of Steam (and other DRM platforms)
    I simply feel obliged to raise this concern (again).
    Honest answer:

    No ones knows what will happen to PC gaming or the desktop PC in 15 years. Maybe Steam is still the #1 and you can run the games just fine. Maybe you need to use an older computer with an older Linux distribution (which I think is fine, because you are probably not going to suddenly play old games daily but just one or two games for nostalgia reasons). And if Valve went bankrupt, they would release patches to remove the Steam checks (if the game developers wouldn't patch their games to run without it before). There's no guarantee for that of course. Steam is still the best solution right now though.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    709

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by d2kx View Post
    Honest answer:

    No ones knows what will happen to PC gaming or the desktop PC in 15 years. Maybe Steam is still the #1 and you can run the games just fine. Maybe you need to use an older computer with an older Linux distribution (which I think is fine, because you are probably not going to suddenly play old games daily but just one or two games for nostalgia reasons). And if Valve went bankrupt, they would release patches to remove the Steam checks (if the game developers wouldn't patch their games to run without it before). There's no guarantee for that of course. Steam is still the best solution right now though.
    Pratically no publivher would allow the removal of the DRM, though solutions might be made for active titles.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •