Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: A Patch-Set Making Btrfs ~20% Faster

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,091

    Default A Patch-Set Making Btrfs ~20% Faster

    Phoronix: A Patch-Set Making Btrfs ~20% Faster

    A revised patch-set was published a few days ago that can make meta-data operations for the Btrfs file-system approximately 20% faster...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTE5NTU

  2. #2

    Default

    ZFSOnLinux already caches metadata information like this. I am surprised that btrfs did not.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,223

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by ryao View Post
    ZFSOnLinux already caches metadata information like this. I am surprised that btrfs did not.
    What do you mean? As far as I can see from the article it is caching file locations, not metadata. This will be a pretty small improvement when dealing with few files, but adds up over many files.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
    Posts
    640

    Default

    just trying it out on my portage-partition

    and it seems to slow down initial performance a bit (tried out a emerge --metadata && eix-update right after mounting the partition - it took pretty long to actually start displaying percentage)

    will see how it goes over time and whether this is only for the first time ...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    19

    Default

    I've patched latest kernel git code, and the result is a kernel oops and non-bootable system.
    btrfs-zero-log utility helps with fs recovery

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheBlackCat View Post
    What do you mean? As far as I can see from the article it is caching file locations, not metadata. This will be a pretty small improvement when dealing with few files, but adds up over many files.
    That information is metadata by definition.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Santiago, Chile
    Posts
    255

    Default

    No btrfsck? No, thank you.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    372

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alejandro Nova View Post
    No btrfsck? No, thank you.
    Btrfs has had an fsck utility for a long, long time now.
    It also has online scrubbing, eliminating the need for fsck in most cases. From personal experience, it works amazingly well.


    Any performance improvements are always welcome. It's an awesome file system already, but there is no denying that it is quite a bit slower than ext4 in some areas.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •