Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Features Being Brewed For KDE 4.10

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    999

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    Ah Panix.

    First he forms an opinion on Radeon drivers from reading Phoronix forums, then he forms an opinion on KDE by reading Distrowatch comments. :rofl:

    Of course, actually trying it and seeing that it's good would be too much work.
    And you have a crystal ball or something? You know what I install and use? Well, it's not working too well.

    I have KDE, for the most part, on my systems. The only exception is XFCE w/ siduction. But, I guess I can't have any worthwhile opinion unless I run it by you, right?

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,932

    Default

    Then I'm interested why you dislike it so much. I've run KDE on Gentoo and Debian, and for the past few years, it's always been stable and snappy.

    I'm running KDE on an ASUS Zenbook and it's the best thing ever.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Thank goodness!I have a good job!



  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Santiago, Chile
    Posts
    257

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by funkSTAR View Post
    It looks like 4.10 will be just as dull as 4.9! The big things are happening in gnome and unity land. Looking aside from the vocal few here at phoro most is realizing KDEs time is up.

    KDE is losing its spot as Major Desktop to Unity. Greatest Phail since KDE4 if you ask me. LoL
    There's a special branch of KDE called "Plasma Active", specially engineered for touchscreen devices, with all the "groundbreaking enhancements". That is the foundation of "KDE 5". So, wait, and enjoy.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,932

    Default

    I'm interested now.

    What big things are happening in the GNOME and Unity land?

    Last time I tried both, they were attempts to recreate Plasma, only with no options.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    15

    Default bogus crtc_bounds() calls, xrandr --panning and xorg.conf virtual

    Are they ever going to fix all of those bogus crtc_bounds() calls that basically destroy
    one's ability to use "xrandr --fb=.. --panning" or virtual displays larger than the
    physical display in "xorg.conf" ?"

    It's well-known. It's been reported. It's a near show-stopper as far as I'm concerned.
    Which is sad.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •