Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 83

Thread: NVIDIA 310.14: OpenGL 4.3, Threaded Optimizations

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    734

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GT220 View Post
    I'm glad Nvidia doesn't release the specs or help nouveau garbage, if it makes retards like asdx go full retard, all the better.
    And I'm happy the Linux developers are not letting your piece of shit blob use DMA-BUF.

    Enjoy your piece of shit blob. Asshole.

    I seriously hope you die, fucking moron.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    734

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asdx View Post
    And I'm happy the Linux developers are not letting your piece of shit blob use DMA-BUF.

    Enjoy your piece of shit blob. Asshole.

    I seriously hope you die, fucking moron.
    Let's see who has the garbage driver when you lack KMS. DMA-BUF, Wayland, etc.

    Fucking idiot.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asdx View Post
    And I'm happy the Linux developers are not letting your piece of shit blob use DMA-BUF.

    Enjoy your piece of shit blob. Asshole.

    I seriously hope you die, fucking moron.
    Just what the blazes is the problem with you? I can't stand it when entitled little twerps carry on in this way, as though saying they hope people die over the tiniest thing is an acceptable way to carry on.

    Michael, if you're looking for votes on banning scumbags, banning this guy gets my vote.

    I'd also like to note that i wasted my first post as a member on making a statement about fools on the internet. I don't care about your closed vs open source grievance, I care about how you conduct yourself when the matter comes up. In this case, like a child.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,502

    Default

    It's fun to see that asdx has got a splitted personality that can even rant against himself

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    492

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Redshirt001 View Post
    Just what the blazes is the problem with you?
    Judging by the ratio of opinion : profanity in his posts, he's obviously deranged.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    78

    Default

    Publishes AMD "all" specifications (specifications of its new technology)? Or AMD only published specifications of old technologies and models that they plan to leave without support?
    Well, we know that AMD is an expert in quickly drop support for graphic card models. Maybe they release specs only when it suits them.
    Did they have taken advantage those specifications with AMD/ATI free driver "radeonhd"?

    Of course, I think it would be better if nVidia published some of its specifications. But at least they give good support in their proprietary drivers. Actually I do not know if "good support" is well expressed. Maybe just "better support" than AMD.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YAFU View Post
    Publishes AMD "all" specifications (specifications of its new technology)? Or AMD only published specifications of old technologies and models that they plan to leave without support?
    Well, we know that AMD is an expert in quickly drop support for graphic card models. Maybe they release specs only when it suits them.
    Did they have taken advantage those specifications with AMD/ATI free driver "radeonhd"?

    Of course, I think it would be better if nVidia published some of its specifications. But at least they give good support in their proprietary drivers. Actually I do not know if "good support" is well expressed. Maybe just "better support" than AMD.
    Well they actually give support for linux. Relatively decent performing drivers and such that are actually regularly updated. Years and years back, it was an absolute nightmare getting fglrx drivers working in linux, back in the mandrake linux days I was having to compile kernel modules and blah blah blah. Horrible.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    734

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bug77 View Post
    Judging by the ratio of opinion : profanity in his posts, he's obviously deranged.
    I'm deranged because I said that I wanted nvidia to publish the specifications for nouveau? Then another idiot comes in and calls nouveau garbage and also insults me.

    So I ask you again, I'm the one deranged?

    You guys are fucking hypocrites.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asdx View Post
    You're the imbecile, asshole.

    You tell me not to be insulting but you insult, what a poor hypocrite and moron you are, I feel sorry for people like you.
    You're right, I did what I blamed you about. So? You go insult people who didn't insult in the first place. Sure the forums will be crap without you .. xD

    Seriously, neither many others, I wouldn't insult you if you took some anger management sessions and learnt to actually converse. Btw, is it really insulting when it's the truth.

    And nvidia at least gives good closed support. Someone else doesn't really give good support in any way ..

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    734

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rigaldo View Post
    You're right, I did what I blamed you about. So? You go insult people who didn't insult in the first place. Sure the forums will be crap without you .. xD

    Seriously, neither many others, I wouldn't insult you if you took some anger management sessions and learnt to actually converse. Btw, is it really insulting when it's the truth.

    And nvidia at least gives good closed support. Someone else doesn't really give good support in any way ..
    I only said I wanted nvidia to publish specs. Then the insults started when another guy insulted me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •