Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 49

Thread: Wayland/Weston 0.99 Is Out, 1.0 Next Monday

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,602

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rigaldo View Post
    Wait wait... Kernel 4.3 within around a year and a half? 0_o
    4.x is waaaaaaay down the road. Torvalds said they will change the name -which more or less means nothing- after 3.x series reaches 3.20.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    245

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 89c51 View Post
    4.x is waaaaaaay down the road. Torvalds said they will change the name -which more or less means nothing- after 3.x series reaches 3.20.
    Good, I was worried I missed something .. xD

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    707

    Default

    I hope Weston/Wayland starts faster than X. My Kernel and Userspace boot is just 1,3 seconds after that the screen goes dark when x server starts and that actually takes longer than the real bootup.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    714

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 89c51 View Post
    Its the desktop guys that "hold it back" and some basic apps of course (ie. firefox). Hope that after the official release we'll see a full desktop in a few months time.
    Hopefully.

    The major toolkits (GTK/QT) have been working on Wayland for a while now. And with it's compositor approach combined with a embedded X server it should already be compatible with all the applications you are using today. Early adopters shouldn't have much trouble using it in a few months, I expect.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    714

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Awesomeness View Post
    IMO modifying applications and its toolkits to look reasonable on retina displays is a more important goal.
    I don't think that trying to force applications to conform to Apple's marketing bullshit is really that high of a priority.

    Plus, since most of Gnome and I suppose KDE uses vector-based graphics and X windows supports arbitrary DPI settings then it should look fine on higher resolution displays if properly configured. Not that most people actually know how to do that. Especially if they are using a desktop that makes it a pain in the ass to configure stuff; like XFCE.

    PS. The secret to retina display is that they moved from 72 DPI to 144 DPI... which means that they took their icons and reduced the size they are shrunk by 50%.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackout23 View Post
    I hope Weston/Wayland starts faster than X. My Kernel and Userspace boot is just 1,3 seconds after that the screen goes dark when x server starts and that actually takes longer than the real bootup.
    Wait what! X Windows started in under 5 seconds on my Pentium 133mhz, and under 2 on my current system.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,602

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rallos Zek View Post
    Wait what! X Windows started in under 5 seconds on my Pentium 133mhz, and under 2 on my current system.
    I think Wayland can be started after KMS starts. In a systemd system where everything loads in parallel you can have it load quite early. Take that with a grain of salt.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drag View Post
    I don't think that trying to force applications to conform to Apple's marketing bullshit is really that high of a priority.

    Plus, since most of Gnome and I suppose KDE uses vector-based graphics and X windows supports arbitrary DPI settings then it should look fine on higher resolution displays if properly configured. Not that most people actually know how to do that. Especially if they are using a desktop that makes it a pain in the ass to configure stuff; like XFCE.
    Why are you guys talking about Apple? Several manufacturers have announced laptops with retina displays, eg Samsung: http://www.zdnet.com/samsung-shows-o...12-7000003588/
    As of today only parts of a typical Linux GUI stack actually works with that many DPI without looking blurry.

    PS: If you guys are bitching because I used the term “retina display”, just go and die. No way I will ever use “High Density Wide Quad High Definition display” (or something like that) to describe the same thing.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    62

    Default

    i think you should go and die then.
    I use a so called retina display since a couple of years, for you see, my <13" laptop is 1920x1080 (oh yeah i just call it a high dpi display)
    i just set the dpi of Xorg to 120 (yeah im not at 144, oh dear) and i'm happy.

    there is one single app in those 2 years that don't behave and its chrome. and to use your language, fuck chrome. firefox's just fine.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    127

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by balouba View Post
    and i'm happy.
    Good, thats the most important thing to us. Your happiness.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •