Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Tests Continue From The 5-Watt Ubuntu ARM Server

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007

    Default Tests Continue From The 5-Watt Ubuntu ARM Server

    Phoronix: Tests Continue From The 5-Watt Ubuntu ARM Server

    After yesterday publishing the first extensive benchmark results for the Calxeda EnergyCore ECX-1000 ARM Servers in the form of the 1.1GHz and 1.4GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A9 nodes running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and Ubuntu 12.10, here are more benchmarks to share today from the "5-Watt ARM Server" on Linux...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2011

    Default So by "5 watts"

    They really mean "8 watts" But who's counting on the fact that they overshoot their stated power levels by 60%.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2011


    it's a broad statement to be interpreted as you can build a 5 watt server if you want, but here we've got more powerful chips to get real work done on.

    Also, can we please have reference points outside of ARM? Performance versus x86 solutions would be nice, just for my brain to wrap around.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2012

    Default Compare with Atom?

    Hi There,

    Thank you for your testing.

    Could you please add on a comparison with an Intel Atom for us?

    In reality, the cost difference between 8 watts and 30 isn't significant for most customers. The cost difference of shifting to a different architecture is.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts