Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: Canonical To Develop Some Ubuntu Features In Private

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,067

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bug77 View Post
    First, if it's not on their web site, it's not a policy. It's a recommendation, at best.
    Second, it doesn't sound like they have anything agaist private branches, but something against not rebasing before committing. And that's VCS 101.
    Third, easy branching for personal use us one of the chief reasons Linus bothered to write git.
    I'm pretty sure the mail said policy but whatever. My main argument that most successful FOSS projects to not do behind-closed-doors development is still true.
    WebKit didn't take off until its development was fully opened. radeonhd (driver) and Xgl died because they were developed in private.

    Android is the exception to the rule and that's because Google are so rich, they neither need nor want community involvement.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    681

    Default

    This article is completely sensationalist.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    492

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Awesomeness View Post
    I'm pretty sure the mail said policy but whatever. My main argument that most successful FOSS projects to not do behind-closed-doors development is still true.
    WebKit didn't take off until its development was fully opened. radeonhd (driver) and Xgl died because they were developed in private.

    Android is the exception to the rule and that's because Google are so rich, they neither need nor want community involvement.
    Now you're mixing features with projects
    Come on, free means also the freedom to develop behind close doors. Plus, they're a private company, we couldn't tell them what to do anyway. What's the worst that could happen? They can run Ubuntu into the ground. So what? There are tons of distribution to choose from.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,067

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bug77 View Post
    Now you're mixing features with projects
    Don't lecture me what I allegedly confuse when you don't even understand basic English!

    Quote Originally Posted by bug77 View Post
    Come on, free means also the freedom to develop behind close doors.
    I said that successful FOSS projects don't do that (how many times did I write exactly the same without you understanding it?!?!?), not that it's forbidden in all FOSS projects.

    The claim was that behind-closed-doors development was common and no it's not. Not in successful FOSS projects at least.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •