Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Systemd 195 Brings "Cool New Features"

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,411

    Default Systemd 195 Brings "Cool New Features"

    Phoronix: Systemd 195 Brings "Cool New Features"

    Lennart Poettering announced the release of systemd 195 on Monday night. This newest release of systemd brings "a non-trivial amount of cool new features."..

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTIxMzE

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    240

    Default

    One thing i dislike that systemd brings are binary log files.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    105

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thaodan View Post
    One thing i dislike that systemd brings are binary log files.
    There's no reason you can't keep using syslog-ng/rsyslog with systemd, and the distribution can make it work out-of-the-box (as syslog-ng does with systemd on Arch).

    The journal provides structured logging (fields of data, with text or binary data like a network packet), indexed by fields, and with features like inline compression. Other loggers have been moving towards structured logging too for quite a while, rsyslog being one of the leaders (binary formats too). It's true that journald could have used a pre-existing format like sqlite3, but it wouldn't have been as specialized for the use case. The journal file format is documented on fd.o, and there's a backwards compatibility guarantee. You can also easily export the contents as text, if you desire.

    The journal is simply another choice, that brings a different set of tradeoffs to the table.
    Last edited by strcat; 10-23-2012 at 02:01 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    166

    Default

    Lennart Poettering the "Two-faced lying weasel" as Linus Torvalds calls him.

    Fuck him and SystemD !!!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,277

    Default

    Haha, I hadn't seen that

    Link for the curious:
    https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/303

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    105

    Default

    Kay Sievers was also the udev maintainer before it was moved into the same repository as systemd to share code, and this problem (the 30 second timeout issue) predates that. The followup conversation between Kay and Linus is right there: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/3/263.
    Last edited by strcat; 10-23-2012 at 02:59 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    Haha, I hadn't seen that

    Link for the curious:
    https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/303
    fix already applyed on in Arch systemd.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rallos Zek View Post
    Lennart Poettering the "Two-faced lying weasel" as Linus Torvalds calls him. --- Fuck him and SystemD !!!
    Linus has also said that he likes many things about systemd, thinks it's interesting and shows a lot of promise. Source.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teho View Post
    Linus has also said that he likes many things about systemd, thinks it's interesting and shows a lot of promise. Source.
    He also said the following:

    LinuxFR : Do you think systemd is a huge improvement in comparison to SysV init ? Is it a game changing technology ?

    Linus Torvalds : I also will take a somewhat wait-and-see approach, it's not widely enough used yet. I do think bootup performance is important, and anything that helps that, and helps make it more flexible is a good thing. Would I call it "game changing"? Probably not.

    source: http://www.preguntaslinux.org/20-ano....html#pid23925

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •