Page 15 of 15 FirstFirst ... 5131415
Results 141 to 147 of 147

Thread: The Steam Linux Beta Begins...

  1. #141
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Over there somewhere
    Posts
    229

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Desti View Post
    That looks significantly less like gnaar shit.

  2. #142
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    245

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by elanthis View Post
    There are plenty of people who install the 32-bit version intentionally for compatibility reasons. I recall Flash on Linux, among a few other proprietary programs, being a bitch to get working in 64-bit mode. It's better now I believe, but who knows. It wasn't too long ago that I was struggling with my 64-bit OS and reading tons of folks in forums loudly proclaiming that 64-bit was useless and nothing but a problem and that folks should just stick to 32-bit. Again, different now, but I don't doubt that many users have just stuck to 32-bit out of inertia.
    Frankly, there *shouldn't* be many programs that have 32 to 64 bit comparability issues. Assuming proper driver/library support to the Kernel, there shouldn't be any apps that don't run.

    There's also people who think that 32-bit is faster if you have 4GB or less of RAM, which is still very common for most PCs built before this year. It actually _is_ faster for some programs, hence the whole x86_32 architecture thing that Google was pushing (smaller pointers means data structures are smaller means more data fits in cache and can be retrieved with each memory access means better data throughput). These folks might intentionally be avoiding 32-bit still. Older hardware is popular with Linux users, and in general cutting-edge hardware is geared more towards gamers who are of course not generally Linux users on account of almost every major PC title still being Windows only.
    But x64 also gives access to many more registers, which is a tradeoff the more then counteracts the increased memory footprint of pointers, especially in threaded workloads.

    Older hardware with less RAM hence is a target market of Steam on Linux, and that includes all the folks who choose 32-bit for speed benefits (even if it's only an imaginary benefit).
    Keep in mind, Linux has been starting to drop older H/W at a very alarming rate (ATI 2000-4000 series, and the 4000 series wasn't THAT old). Nevermind Steam isn't exactly a large data intensive program to begin with...

  3. #143
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,502

    Default

    Linux did not drop anything, just AMD did.

  4. #144
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    102

    Default

    For all with Serious Sam 3 BFE performance issues: check the latest "public beta" update http://steamcommunity.com/app/221410...5737407496778/
    There was a CnQ/PowerNow bug. Improvement can be huge:
    I'm getting 20-50 FPS on Ultra in the Publicbeta as opposed to about 12-35 on Medium before.
    Last edited by kwahoo; 11-14-2012 at 02:27 PM.

  5. #145
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,502

    Default

    In theory a bug could be only in the init phase when there is a speed test for calibration. Would be a very stupid code however as usually when there is more load the speed goes up.

  6. #146
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    102

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    In theory a bug could be only in the init phase when there is a speed test for calibration.
    I don't think so. It's not too high/too low graphics quality problem. FPS counter is (and CPU frequency too) jumping, eg. 10-70. Check the fps chart
    Code:
    prf_bShowFPSGraph=1
    prf_tmRefreshInterval=0
    Last edited by kwahoo; 11-14-2012 at 03:31 PM.

  7. #147
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,502

    Default

    I am not in the beta and i do not intend to buy the game.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •