Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Four-Way ARM Linux Distribution Comparison

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Koszalin, Poland
    Posts
    131

    Default

    @JS987: Thanks

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,302

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mitcoes View Post
    Multiple pandaboards as server -
    How well they scale?
    Michael already did this:
    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag..._cluster&num=1

    How much are needed to equal an i7 more or less?
    How much would cost this multi Panda board server vs a single i7? cost/performance
    And how many energy this multi PAnda spend vs a single i7 energy efficiency
    Also how well i7 scales vs ARM, then 4 i7s vs 4 multi Panda Borads alike systems, with the intermediate steps.
    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...cluster&num=16
    When comparing to an i7, ARM clusters seem to be much more expensive, a bit less power efficient, and not much faster, if at all. I think you're underestimating the power of Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge i7s. Even AMD systems are likely more power, time, and cost efficient. Keep in mind that whenever you do cluster computing, for every computer you add you're wasting electricity on powering a whole separate system, you drastically lower latency (by communication, error checking, translation between gathering the data and interpreting it for use, timing everything properly, the relatively lengthy wires, etc), you spend more time setting it up, and the more systems you have there's a higher probability of failure. In other words, if you're looking to massively parallel something without going beyond 64 cores, you're wasting time, energy, effort, and money on a cluster. You can get up to 64 threads in 1 system with a SPARC T3 setup. Also, there are server motherboards that allow 4 AMD CPUs at a time. I'm not sure if they support socket G34 (I think that's the socket name) but if they do you can have up to 48 cores using 4 of AMD's 12-core Opterons. Those Opterons are overall a much much better value than the Intel competitor.
    Last edited by schmidtbag; 11-09-2012 at 10:34 AM.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,102

    Default

    There are some 16-core opterons, so you can get 64 x86 cores in a box too.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,302

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    There are some 16-core opterons, so you can get 64 x86 cores in a box too.
    I don't think those are available yet, and they're actually 8-module systems, so 16 threads. The 12-core Opterons are actually 12 full cores, so they're probably a little more reliable.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,102

    Default

    Thread hijack: Bulldozer module edition

    One BD module = two int cores, one shared fp core. So only for floats you can say it's not two cores - for integer math it is two cores.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •