Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Shumway: Mozilla Does An Open-Source SWF Runtime

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Camarillo, CA
    Posts
    72

    Default

    It is extremely annoying to not have flash on my mobile browser, extremely. It basically blocks you from seeing a huge amount of videos and content.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisXY View Post
    I'd estimate 99% of my flash usage is watching videos.

    The sad thing is, that adobe themselves did say that the flash plugin is not for solving the problem of playing videos.
    https://blogs.adobe.com/penguinswf/2..._problems.html

    They still don't seem to realize that (my estimation 95% of users only ever want to watch flash videos with it. They should have made a "flashplugin light" that was only capable of video playback and solving that problem efficiently.
    That would have the advantage of making the flash advertisement garbage go away. Without ads this phoronix article makes chromium consume about 0% CPU on my 3632qm, with flash ads, chromium consumes accumulated about 10 to 20% CPU (of one core). I wonder how much energy humanity could have saved not having flash ads. I mean, not even not clogging the bandwidth with ads, just the client pcs not displaying them.
    Not only do the ads waste energy and bandwidth compared to text ads, they also most often destroy or compromise the layout and are just plain ugly.

    I mean, what the fuck.


    So I would like a flash player that only is capable of playing flash content.

    Maybe the approach of Shumway is modular enough so that you can restrict the code loading to that code that plays videos.
    I wonder... phoronix is on my whitelist for adblock, so the ads are downloaded and I can see the links in form of an arrow because flashblock won't run them. Does that count for phoronix still as ad viewed or do they not get any money for it?

    Sometimes I even run GNU JavaScript blocker, because most websites are just annoying with all the poppy flashy stuff.

    So, what is all the fuss about flash? It is utterly useless and websites, that use it, have mostly rather no content at all. Youtube still runs the html5 beta for their videos and I would say ~70% are presented in a non-flash player to me.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    I hope you guys know that pr0n is responsible for killing several formats, right? If something's not compatible with porn, it's not going to succeed, even if it's 10 times better than a porn-compatible format. Good examples are Beta vs VHS and HD-DVD vs Blu-Ray.
    I'd like to see RMS give a speech at the AVN awards or something.


    @elanthis

    Good to know. Thanks.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,538

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by disi View Post
    I wonder... phoronix is on my whitelist for adblock, so the ads are downloaded and I can see the links in form of an arrow because flashblock won't run them.
    Youtube still runs the html5 beta for their videos and I would say ~70% are presented in a non-flash player to me.
    Don't they give money for clicks on the advertisements only?

    And their HTML5 beta got broken after the last UI change. Not sure if they fixed it yet.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GreatEmerald View Post
    Don't they give money for clicks on the advertisements only?

    And their HTML5 beta got broken after the last UI change. Not sure if they fixed it yet.
    If you mean the white layout (not widely available yet i think) it was broken but it got fixed. The problem is monetized videos that don't show up in the main site but work fine when embedded on other sites etc. Fucking stupid.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,086

    Default

    YAY!!! Lets write video decoders in an interpreted programming language (javascript) :-P

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,538

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 89c51 View Post
    If you mean the white layout (not widely available yet i think) it was broken but it got fixed.
    Ah, good to know. And I thought it was available for all registered users, or was I selected to be a part of the beta by chance?

  8. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uid313 View Post
    Is it porno-compatible?

    My only use for Flash is porno.
    Theres a little know site called https://thepiratebay.se/ where you can find all the porn on earth for free and you don't need Flash installed to access it.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,023

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kivada View Post
    Theres a little know site called https://thepiratebay.se/ where you can find all the porn on earth for free and you don't need Flash installed to access it.
    I know, but then you have to download it and can't stream it.
    Also, torrents often only work good for recently released stuff.

  10. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uid313 View Post
    I know, but then you have to download it and can't stream it.
    Also, torrents often only work good for recently released stuff.
    Yeah, but unlike the streaming sites you can actually see what is going into where from the torrents as they come in at 1080p now instead of the 340p rez on the flash streamers.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •