Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Intel Ivy Bridge Acceleration Of UXA vs. SNA

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    ฿ 16LDJ6Hrd1oN3nCoFL7BypHSEYL84ca1JR
    Posts
    1,020

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycheese View Post
    This is an extension, the primary cfg is set in text files with is the right way. "Detect" thing will fail in several cases, although its a good one. It still needs maintenance.
    Everything you wrote is non-exclusively correct, lets find a guy who implements it. :P
    Well, it's not that hard. https://dl.dropbox.com/u/13721560/setaccel.py (I just did that to remember and train a little PyQt4).
    You would "just" need to extend it to parse the output of X -config.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    For people not using opensuse, what happened to their conf tool? A short history on why this superior tool is no longer maintained would be useful.
    This sums it up in a nutshell

    http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-f.../msg00017.html

    as an alternative they now offer this:

    http://forums.opensuse.org/english/g...ide-users.html

    Which is a completely f*** up expectation of a user to follow and throws back end user computing experience decades into the past.


    With SaX2 you were even able to use a windows.inf monitor file to get the correct modeline entries into your xorg if the EDID (which in itself was easily disabled or overridden from a gui) didn't work properly.

    Trust me there were a fair number that were PO'd at the discontinuation of SaX2

    https://features.opensuse.org/308357
    Last edited by deanjo; 12-07-2012 at 02:26 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •