Cue FunkStar in 5...4...3...2...1...
He must have a really hard time with this one. He hates KDE, so he would hate any project joining KDE, so he could troll about that. But then again it is already a Qt project, which he also hates.
Phoronix: Trojita Is Pulled In As A KDE Project
The Trojita program is becoming part of the KDE project. Trojita is a Qt-based lightweight email application...
http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTI0NjA
Cue FunkStar in 5...4...3...2...1...
He must have a really hard time with this one. He hates KDE, so he would hate any project joining KDE, so he could troll about that. But then again it is already a Qt project, which he also hates.
Wonderful news, great thanks to those developing it!
Now those low on memory have analogue of Claws Mail / Sypheed Claws, but for Qt. Really really good!
Outlook, you know its about mail
Thunderbird, you know its about mail
Evolution, you know its about mail
Exchange, you know its about mail
Pine, you know its about mail
Oh wait...
Well, lets look at Wikipedia's Comparison of Email Clients. It lists 50 clients. 11 of them have mail is an integral part of their name (so including, say, KMail, or WIndows Mail, but excluding, say, Eureka Email, which could just be called Eureka).
if smtp and pop3 get supported will kmail then be replaced? kmail is one of those programs that mindlessly has K in front of it.
Beside damaging the reputation of KDE, those unmaintained apps still cause headache for the bug hunting crews. Users will still complain anyway
Unmaintained does not mean they don't need maintenance - as build breakage has to be fixed anyway - mostly by people not familiar with the codebase, lowering its quality even further.
Look at all those apps beeing hosted and distributed by KDE, which do not even remotly do have something to do with a desktop environment (well, except they have a graphical user interface).
Not at all of course.And of course KDE is the only project with unmaintained apps.
I just don't get the need to move every project that is based on QT and has a few KDE hooks under the KDE umbrella.
If beeing under the KDE umbrella doesn't mean anything (as you proposed with your first statement), whats the deal beeing under it?
If it does mean something, projects probably it should be moved under it more carefully.