Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Valve Source Engine Linux Benchmarks Are Imminent

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,359

    Default Valve Source Engine Linux Benchmarks Are Imminent

    Phoronix: Valve Source Engine Linux Benchmarks Are Imminent

    I am now cleared to begin publishing Linux graphics benchmarks of Valve's Source Engine games on Linux plus other performance-related information from the Steam Linux client...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTI0NjY

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    93

    Default

    If at all possible, can you also include Windows (and possible OSX) tests for comparison ?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    33

    Default

    Due to the 100% Steam CPU bug which Valve still hasn't fixed (See http://steamcommunity.com/app/221410...6056740854031/ ), any benchmarks done right now are not really accurate. I could get a 20+ FPS difference by messing up with Steam process niceness, and that doesn't even fix the issue, it just lowers it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    521

    Default

    I would really like to see AMD windows vs linux benchmarks, especially on low-end hardware. I know people that say that they play TF2 (on windows) on hardware similar or lower than my AMD E-350, and the linux version with the very latest AMD drivers and with lowest graphics is unplayable.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    181

    Default

    I'm definitely interested to see how old of an integrated Intel GPU can play these games at 30 FPS, since there are tons of cheap chipsets that include them. Making my own little arcade box for Steam would be a fun weekend project.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    146

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sunshine State
    Posts
    303

    Default

    If you're going to use Ubuntu, please make sure the latest updates (Undirect fullscreen windows) is enabled, or test in Gnobuntu, at least on some tests, please!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Thessaloniki,GR
    Posts
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by F i L View Post
    If you're going to use Ubuntu, please make sure the latest updates (Undirect fullscreen windows) is enabled, or test in Gnobuntu, at least on some tests, please!
    Canonical claim they have fixed the bug but yet enabling this option gets you 10% better performance!

    Also, use a Performance governor instead of On Demand. Otherwise, SS3 cannot utilize the processor correctly.

    Things are in beta, they supposed to be experimental, == not accurate, but ok.

    Generally, if you use HD4000 you can play the game in Windows, but in Linux, because it is barely playable. I will have some benchmarks with my Macbook comparing: Windows 8, Mountain Lion and Ubuntu 12.04 using a timedemo for Team Fortress. Personally, I set minimum 40FPS as my limit for playability.
    Last edited by Dr.Paneas; 12-08-2012 at 07:41 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    1

    Default

    It would nice to see GNU/Linux vs Windows 7 in these benchmarks:
    1. SS3 GNU/Linux vs Windows 7(D3D) vs Windows 7 (OpenGL)
    2. TF2 OpenGL vs Windows 7 D3D

    Hopefully AMD can release a driver with OpenGL performance close to Nvidia's considering how far superior Nvidia's is.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,523

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr.Paneas View Post
    Generally, if you use HD4000 you can play the game in Windows, but in Linux, because it is barely playable.
    That's funny, since my experience with new games so far (I have just recently got to play a new Unity game on Linux), fglrx + Radeon HD4890 works worse than a stock HD Graphics 2500. And this is with a rather old Mesa release, too.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •