Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 68

Thread: DragonFlyBSD, CentOS, Ubuntu, Solaris Benchmarks

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,361

    Default DragonFlyBSD, CentOS, Ubuntu, Solaris Benchmarks

    Phoronix: DragonFlyBSD, CentOS, Ubuntu, Solaris Benchmarks

    For your viewing pleasure today are benchmarks of the DragonFlyBSD, Ubuntu, CentOS, Oracle Solaris Express, and OpenIndiana operating systems.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=18251

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    845

    Default

    What is the point of these system benchmarks when you're not using the same compiler? More than anything you are comparing GCC 4.47, GCC 4.46, GCC 4.52, GCC 4.3.3 against eachother.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    212

    Default

    So what we learn is: Use CentOS, drop Dumbuntu.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI, USA
    Posts
    862

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cthulhux View Post
    So what we learn is: Use CentOS, drop Dumbuntu.
    Yeah, I noticed that too... I had always assumed that CentOS was the old/slow/reliable distro for people who didn't want to pay for RedHat Enterprise... at least that was my experience at my previous work place.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    72

    Lightbulb

    can we have some tests comparing debian with the other debian-based distros?
    I am very curious to see what those distros fix and break from the original branch.

    ofc this is a opportunity to ask other similar test for slack-based, redhat distros, arch-based, etc.

    i am looking forward for those benchmarks

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cthulhux View Post
    So what we learn is: Use CentOS, drop Dumbuntu.
    No. What we learn is: Use Linux, drop Solaris and the pathetic DragonflyBSD.

    Do you know that Solaris is actually BSD that has actually been closed off and Propriety?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XorEaxEax View Post
    What is the point of these system benchmarks when you're not using the same compiler? More than anything you are comparing GCC 4.47, GCC 4.46, GCC 4.52, GCC 4.3.3 against eachother.
    And whos fault is that? It's the BSD and Solaris devs who refuse to use more advance compilers cause their pimps M$ and apple didn't like software compiled by a GPLv3 compiler.

    So what Michael is testing is what you get from these software due to the decisions of their devs.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yorgos View Post
    can we have some tests comparing debian with the other debian-based distros?
    I am very curious to see what those distros fix and break from the original branch.

    ofc this is a opportunity to ask other similar test for slack-based, redhat distros, arch-based, etc.

    i am looking forward for those benchmarks
    I agree. I especially want more test of Debian GNU/Linux vs Debian GNU/Kfreebsd to emphasize to poeple the amount of time and effort wasted by Debian in helping and using BSD.

    You see that Kfreebsd is always slower then Linux version.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    212

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BSD BullShitDistro View Post
    Do you know that Solaris is actually BSD that has actually been closed off and Propriety?
    Actually it is System V which always has been proprietary.

  10. #10

    Default

    OpenIndiana has a new feature which could possibly trick some benchmarks: https://www.illumos.org/issues/3236 I wonder if this is the reason for the rather astonishing difference between OpenIndiana and Snoracle Solaris in the Threaded I/O benchmark.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •