Quote Originally Posted by BSD Sucks and Dies View Post
No actually it's trying to enlighten people about how dangerous and destructive BSD is to a person's life and freedom.
Really? Could you please provide your definition of 'freedom'?

Quote Originally Posted by BSD Sucks and Dies View Post
BSD is meanless and insignificant by itself(s) but they supply code big empires like MS and apple (because they can't make thier own code) which in turn strip people of their freedom so, BSD actually contributes to the proliferation of proprietary software and the subversion of people's freedom.
You are missing too much... You need to remember why and how of BSD. Do you know the context where BSD originally was developed? It was from academy, way before MS and Apple. With this said, your judgement is unfair and, to some extent, even pointless. Because BSD preceded MS and Apple, BSD (together with the license) isn't a CONSEQUENCE of them, as you repeatedly seem to imply; they (BSD and license) were invented independently and, if you recall, the original intention was to FREE UNIX FROM AT&T.
If Apple has taken BSD's code, and even if they don't return the enhancements, this is just a side effect I don't care about, because the original philosophy remains untouched.

Quote Originally Posted by BSD Sucks and Dies View Post
Only when BSD dies will free software dominate over proprietary software
Apart from this statement being totally wrong, I don't care who dominates the software scene.
And, once more, it would be nice for you to provide what you meen by 'free', as this whole discussion ultimately boils down to this question.