Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: AMD Radeon Performance Preview On Linux 3.8

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,305

    Default AMD Radeon Performance Preview On Linux 3.8

    Phoronix: AMD Radeon Performance Preview On Linux 3.8

    With word this week that there's some performance improvements for the open-source Radeon Linux graphics driver to be found with the Linux 3.8 kernel as a result of the a-synchronous DMA engine support, some very early benchmarks of the "drm-next" code were done from five different AMD Radeon graphics cards. In extreme cases, the open-source graphics driver can deliver 10x higher OpenGL frame-rates with the experimental kernel.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=18266

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    357

    Default

    Dear santa...

    performance isn't that important to me - the games i have run perfectly well

    what i'd like to see is my radeonhd 4650 do under/overscan from grub as my tv/monitor sucks balls when it comes to edid although catalyst can compensate from the gui

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI, USA
    Posts
    861

    Default

    Random note: Xonotic was run with Low settings here, and produced no change. Xonotic on my machine with Ultimate settings tripled its framerate.

    Also, what's up with that 6570? Seems like someone broke something, the question is where...
    Last edited by Veerappan; 12-14-2012 at 12:56 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Rural Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,017

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Article
    While the a-synchronous DMA engine support is there on the kernel side, for exploiting its full capabilities is also user-space support that has yet to be integrated into the mainline repositories.
    Can this explain some of the problems here, or is that mostly due to the code being new and needing more time to get the bugs worked out?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    78

    Default

    I think I have had a similar bug, but with a different card series... https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50655

    Anyway, with that bug I had some tests continue even though they had frozen for a time. PTS was able to detect this because the FPS changed, but then I would need to intervene. In most cases it would just run the test many many times and then call it done.

    Look in the logs for GPU lockup / soft lockup / lookup for 1000ms etc. This might be a good thing for PTS to autodetect... Because it may be in some of your finished results..

    Thanks!
    Bryan

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sunshine State
    Posts
    303

    Default

    Well thankfully, most of the performance regressions seem to be very minor (except with Nexius), and some performances gains are very prominent (when they're there). It does look like something got broke in the HD 5xxx series code though.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,320

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by D0pamine View Post
    Dear santa...

    performance isn't that important to me - the games i have run perfectly well

    what i'd like to see is my radeonhd 4650 do under/overscan from grub as my tv/monitor sucks balls when it comes to edid although catalyst can compensate from the gui
    You can adjust the underscan with xrandr using the underscan, underscan vborder, and underscan hborder parameters.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,517

    Default

    Hmm, I wonder what makes 4770 so special (it has basically only regressed here), and if it is the same when using higher-end R700 cards...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    191

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GreatEmerald View Post
    Hmm, I wonder what makes 4770 so special (it has basically only regressed here), and if it is the same when using higher-end R700 cards...
    once on some kernel's DRM change for radeons my Radeon's 4730 (RV770CE) had all its video output garbled up, because some small thing for it had to be handled differently.
    i damn hope, that i will not get 10x slow down now with 3.8 similarly :(

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    598

    Default

    IMHO, these tests should start not only to be tested with discrete video cards but also with APUs like the A8-5500, A8-5600K, A10-5700 and A10-5800K...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •