https://blake2.net/blake2_20121223.pdf TL;DR "BLAKE was already more secure, we reduced some params to gain speed"
Funny. BLAKE2 (being faster than MD5 yet more secure) seems to disprove that absolute (and utterly incorrect) correlation.
The takeaway message for us lowly non-security types was pretty simple, yet none of us got it: I'll be pretty happy when I can replace the md5sum command line tool with something faster that I can have a reasonable amount of confidence in.
https://blake2.net/blake2_20121223.pdf TL;DR "BLAKE was already more secure, we reduced some params to gain speed"