Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Linux On The Microsoft Surface Won't Be Easy

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,405

    Default Linux On The Microsoft Surface Won't Be Easy

    Phoronix: Linux On The Microsoft Surface Won't Be Easy

    If you were hoping you would be able to run your favorite Linux distribution on Microsoft's new Surface Tablet, it doesn't look like it will be an easy task to accomplish...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTI2NDY

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    790

    Default

    Firstly, I think Linux on Surface has already been accomplished, although the results of that may not be public.

    But the question is, why would you want to pay $500 for a 10" 1366x768 tablet with Tegra 3, 2 GB RAM and 32 GB flash memory when Android tablets with better specs can be had for less. And usually those have unlocked bootloaders so you can replace Android with whatever Linux distro you prefer.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    362

    Default

    Just buy a Nexus (or if you want the keyboard functionality, a Transformer) tablet. Open bootloaders (or unlockable) and you get the same chip under the hood (if you use a Nexus 7 or any TF) with a higher PPI display. Don't give Microsoft your money for the Windows RT license.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,907

    Default Exactly like an iPad, or numerous other locked down ARM devices

    Non-story.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    67

    Default

    To all those who think this isn't important or is a non-story, you're missing an important point here.

    This confirms our worst fears: that you cannot install Linux based distros except maybe with extreme difficulty on such devices. And this is in fact an anti-competitive move by Microsoft.

    It may be limited to the Windows Surface tablets now, but what if it becomes more widespread? What if more device manufacturers follow suit and this becomes the norm even for Android devices? Such a thing is simply not acceptable. Of course, such devices have existed before, and will exist in the future - but we can't continue accepting such things. We've got to show device manufacturers and companies that we will NOT accept such restrictive devices.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    224

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sandy8925 View Post
    To all those who think this isn't important or is a non-story, you're missing an important point here.

    This confirms our worst fears: that you cannot install Linux based distros except maybe with extreme difficulty on such devices. And this is in fact an anti-competitive move by Microsoft.

    It may be limited to the Windows Surface tablets now, but what if it becomes more widespread? What if more device manufacturers follow suit and this becomes the norm even for Android devices? Such a thing is simply not acceptable. Of course, such devices have existed before, and will exist in the future - but we can't continue accepting such things. We've got to show device manufacturers and companies that we will NOT accept such restrictive devices.
    Do you live under a rock? Limited to windows surface tablets? It's been like this on 90% of these devices. This IS the norm for many many android devices and all iOS devices. Many android devices have locked bootloaders. I have a nexus which doesn't so I am lucky.

    This is nothing new.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,907

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sandy8925 View Post
    It may be limited to the Windows Surface tablets now, but what if it becomes more widespread? What if more device manufacturers follow suit and this becomes the norm even for Android devices?
    It's already the norm, and it's been that way for a decade. I'm not sure why you think MS is pushing this tendency - if anything, they are the ones following in the footsteps of everyone else.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,353

    Default

    thats soooo much crap too.

    Thats exactly like saying.... "But maa-aaaah you're a crackhead, so I thought I could be a crackhead too! But I'm gonna use this fatter needle and bigger syringe, and I'm gonna knock you out and make you take my (bigger) dosage in your eyeball!!"
    Last edited by duby229; 12-29-2012 at 10:15 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,024

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sandy8925 View Post
    This confirms our worst fears: that you cannot install Linux based distros except maybe with extreme difficulty on such devices. And this is in fact an anti-competitive move by Microsoft.
    It's hardly anti-competitive at a device level, since they'll be making their money off you by just buying the hardware, independent of the OS on it. One might argue that they don't want to lose the Windows Store royalties; I don't know what those are, how significant they will be for Microsoft, etc. That could be, but then, if they're subsidizing the hardware at all (given the outcry from other vendors over how cheap Microsoft was making their initial Surface hardware, this seems likely) it's hard to fault Microsoft for not wanting to give you subsidized hardware that won't make them money back.

    It's also for DRM purposes, I'd imagine. Rooted Android tablets (and to a lesser extent, rooted iPads) are considered a major problem by many software developers. Microsoft said, "no worries, bro, we gots your back." Rooting the Surface -- and hence bypassing the DRM -- is not going to be easy, and hence application developers on Windows 8 RT can rely on their users being legitimate paying customers. Same goes for any media DRM.

    The other part is protecting these simplified devices from certain classes of malware, which does exist in the wild for rooted iPad and Android devices, I might note. The people who want SecureBoot to outright disappear are absolutely retarded. Demanding that you have some means to control it if you own the device is very reasonable, but asking that the world do without legitimate security protections entirely because you're afraid some hardware vendors will be mean is silly.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    428

    Default There is a simple solution

    Don't Buy Surface!

    My goal is not to give any money to MS, so why on Earth would I consider buying MS-specific hardware in the first place?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •