Well, that's what you can expect from proprietary corporations and proprietary software: they always try to fool their customers and treating them like retards. That's one of major reasons to stay away from these as far as you can. I'm personally consider proprietary software untrusted by default. Availability of source is a good indication that program vendor respects fair play. Sure, it's dumb to release sources if you backdoored and trojanized something: this increases chance to get caught and allows to uncloak this treason faster.
Besides Apple and Samsung is it anyone of the other phone maker that do better than Nokia?
HTC, maybe?
Nokia did a much better q4 than htc.
Lol. Yeah no. It didn't. These are the Q4 sales results:
1 - Samsung - 63.7 million (preliminary)
2 - Apple - 47.8 million
3 - Huawei - (approx 20 million)
4 - ZTE - 12.5 million
5 - either Sony or Lenovo - (Sony likely sold about 10.5 million)
6 - ether Lenovo or Sony - Lenovo sold 9.8 million
7 - LG - 8.6 million
8 - HTC - 7.0 million
9 - RIM - 6.9 million
10 - either Nokia or Yulong/Coolpad - Nokia sold 6.6 million
Nokia sold 4.4 million lumia phone (their premium phone 920 was released late in the quarter and in limited market and had supply restraint)
they sold 2.2 million symbian phone
and 9.3 million asha phone
If you count the non smartphone they totally sold around 80 million phones in q4.
Much less than when they was as biggest. But if you look at the market, most of the phone maker besides Apple and Samsung did negative result q4. Nokia made $580 million in operating profit how much came from the device unit I'm unsure about. I suppose Nokia-Siemens was the most profitable part of the company. But I got the impression both the device and services unit and Nokia-Siemens got a better q4 than earlier q in 2012.