View Poll Results: Free Software or Open Source

Voters
37. You may not vote on this poll
  • Free Software

    17 45.95%
  • Open Source

    20 54.05%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: poll: free software or open source

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,070

    Default

    I'm also wondering wether this means which kind of software we prefer, or which name for free as in freedom?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Bristol, England
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by halfmanhalfamazing View Post
    I lean slightly towards free. I support a person's right to produce software, and keep the source code for themselves. Sell it, reproduce it, etc. For themselves.

    Without individual rights, there is nothing.

    If that individual decides they want to open the source of their software for the rest of us, I'll applaud it every single time. But it should be up to an owner to open source, not a bunch of strong arm tactics that force someone to do it against their will.

    (AMD/ATI is a good example. We've polled, petitioned, asked, and taken our business somewhere else. But nobody did anything illegal, dangerous, or otherwise highly stupid. AMD/ATI decided to do it on their own. They're my heros of the year) :-)
    Doesn't free (as in freedom, libre) software imply open source as a requirement to achieve that? If the user has no right to view and modify the code, it's not free/libre anymore. I'm sure you're refering to BSD-style, but as I understood it, the original open source is free, but if a program is made from that code does not open it's source, it may be obeying the terms of the licence, but it's no longer free/libre by defintion.

    My view? They both go hand in hand, and both rely on eachother. I agree the infighting is damaging, and making people loose track of why people of both sides chose to go down the alternate path, and who the 'real' (lack of better term) 'enemy' is, the proprietary world of Microsoft, Apple, Adobe etc.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    10

    Default

    Why does open source have to mean free. I would be willing to pay more for a piece of software that I had the source code to. And as far as companies go, I'm sure they would be thrilled to be able to purchase code to edit as they need.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by derred View Post
    And as far as companies go, I'm sure they would be thrilled to be able to purchase code to edit as they need.
    There are examples of that in the real world. One that springs to mind is Shake for Linux.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •