Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Lightworks Re-Opens Its Linux Alpha For Testing

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,369

    Default Lightworks Re-Opens Its Linux Alpha For Testing

    Phoronix: Lightworks Re-Opens Its Linux Alpha For Testing

    Lightworks, the professional non-linear video editing software that has been talked about for years as coming to Linux, is re-opening its Linux Alpha program to solicit additional testing...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTI3MTk

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    205

    Default Liars!

    They promised an Open Source version, then lies.

    Now they want to sell the propietary version on Linux, but nobody cares about it.

    Obviously they are desesperate to attract market, but they are failing.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    224

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by timofonic View Post
    They promised an Open Source version, then lies.

    Now they want to sell the propietary version on Linux, but nobody cares about it.

    Obviously they are desesperate to attract market, but they are failing.
    There will be source code. I looks like it will be more open core though.
    As for nobody caring, this is one of the most watched and wanted ports to Linux. The first actually useful professional video editor. Something Linux does not have. All the open source ones are shit. They are fine for simple things, but not for any complex pro stuff. Only kdenlive comes even close.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    SuperUserLand
    Posts
    535

    Default

    THEY FUCKING KIDDING ME RIGHT NOW???????????




    This area is restricted
    Last edited by Pallidus; 01-10-2013 at 10:05 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    SuperUserLand
    Posts
    535

    Default

    I GOT INNNNNNNNNN


    suck it bitches



    now to edit my gay prons

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    267

    Default

    It's open for the next 100 minutes.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    481

    Default Lightworks needs to get off paid codecs to be a valid Linux contender, use Kdenlive

    Quote Originally Posted by n3wu53r View Post
    There will be source code. I looks like it will be more open core though.
    As for nobody caring, this is one of the most watched and wanted ports to Linux. The first actually useful professional video editor. Something Linux does not have. All the open source ones are shit. They are fine for simple things, but not for any complex pro stuff. Only kdenlive comes even close.
    Kdenlive does everything I need a video editor to do-and does so without paid codecs. With Kdenlive, I can drop the AVCHD clips the camera makes right into the project, and export to any format I want, all without paying for codecs and without rewarding MPEG-LA's patent beast. It seems to me the main advantage of high-end paid editors is GPU rendering or good accelerated GPU acceleration of effects for playback, both of which I can do without. In fact, I found that AMD Bulldozer 8 core CPU's can beat midlevel Nvidia cards in Blender cycles rendering as a CPU vs GPU benchmark anyway.

    Since I make only non-monetized video, I would be nuts to use licensed and monetized codecs. It seems to me the paid video people are going to be the ones for whom Lightworks means being able to use Linux instead of Windows, but the point here is that they were ever Windows and codec customers in the first place. Others like myself want nothing to do with paid codecs and paid software, considering them ports of the Microsoft/Crapple philosophy. If Kdenlive goes unmaintained, I still have both source and binaries and will keep using them, rejecting alternatives that rely on paid codecs.

    If Lightworks releases source, they are not in any way legally responsible for people modifying it to use ffmpeg/libavconf and compiling it themselves. Of course, they would soon lose all sales of their paid versions. Lightworks is not free software because it comes from people whose interest is in PAID software. When their free version works with free patent-busting codecs, and does not require any kid of account to download I might take another look at at, but won't trust it without them releasing source as well.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •