Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25

Thread: Snowshoe: New Cross-Platform Web-Browser On Qt5, WebKit2

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    187

    Default

    Well, Fennec did run on the N9, and the primary development framework for MeeGo was Qt, but not used in Fennec (the old mobile Firefox).

    Does anybody know if Sailfish or Ubuntu Phone OS use Qt because it's necessary on the hardware they're targetting? Maemo used X11, for instance, but perhaps GTK can't run on whatever they're using to display these new systems. Qt is easier to port to alternative platforms with Lighthouse.

    Theoretically, GTK applications could run through the Broadway HTML5 backend, but that would be unpleasant given the apparent lack of hardware acceleration. I guess we'll just have to see what exactly these phones are using- I assume it's not X11 for Ubuntu Phone OS, since you can't just load up X11 drivers on any Android phone, right?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    119

    Default

    I'm looking forward to trying this out if/when it hits the AUR. Unfortunatey I don't see arch or any other distrobution shipping Qt 5 very soon...

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uid313 View Post
    But why should users be interested in it?
    Well QtWebKit is pretty amazing in itself. Just yesterday I installed rekonq on my computer for the first time in long time; On my KDE environment it started so fast that I couldn't believe my eyes (almost instant compared to around a second for Chrome). It even opened the web pages faster than Chrome which is hard to believe and this is not even Qt 5 which brings a lot faster JavaScript engine among other things.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    71

    Default

    So another webkit clone ? Compiled with -OMGWTF optimisation ?
    Meh.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    637

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mayankleoboy1 View Post
    So another webkit clone ? Compiled with -OMGWTF optimisation ?
    Meh.
    You should replace webkit with khtml and say what you said about safari and chrome.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pawlerson View Post
    You should replace webkit with khtml and say what you said about safari and chrome.
    Atleast Chrome has the super duper fast Crankshaft JS engine. That runs circles around all the competing engines. So for Chrome atleast, i wouldnt call it a clone of anything.
    As far as Safari goes, FUCK APPLE.


    One question : All the layout goodness that Chrome has, its Webkit based. So any other browser that uses it will have the same speed as Chrome (at least in pure layout. No major JS). ?

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Adiyaman, Turkey
    Posts
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ShadowBane View Post
    I'm looking forward to trying this out if/when it hits the AUR. Unfortunatey I don't see arch or any other distrobution shipping Qt 5 very soon...
    After reading the article I did a quick "yaourt -Ss", and disappointed that it wasn't there. I hope somebody adds a PKGBUILD soon.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,300

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ShadowBane View Post
    I'm looking forward to trying this out if/when it hits the AUR. Unfortunatey I don't see arch or any other distrobution shipping Qt 5 very soon...
    openSUSE has had Qt5 available since the betas.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    513

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pawlerson View Post
    You should replace webkit with khtml and say what you said about safari and chrome.
    Actually, no one should. KHTML isn't influencing WebKit and hasn't for many years. Sorry, but that distant fork was soon replaced with WebKit. WebKit 2 is a whole new beast, years in the making.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    299

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teho View Post
    Well QtWebKit is pretty amazing in itself. Just yesterday I installed rekonq on my computer for the first time in long time; On my KDE environment it started so fast that I couldn't believe my eyes (almost instant compared to around a second for Chrome). It even opened the web pages faster than Chrome which is hard to believe and this is not even Qt 5 which brings a lot faster JavaScript engine among other things.
    no it's not. and it is no wonder that rekonq started so much faster than chrome when half of its libs etc. are already preloaded due to using KDE DE.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •