So boot perfomance depends on hardware config. The regressions can be found by using systemds blame/analyze tools.
Phoronix: Fedora 18 Systemd Boot Performance Is Mixed
In addition to open-source graphics driver benchmarking, another area being explored with the recent release of Fedora 18 is the boot performance. Here's some initial results from three systems compared to the Spherical Cow's predecessor.
http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=18402
So boot perfomance depends on hardware config. The regressions can be found by using systemds blame/analyze tools.
On my hardware, the total boot time is noticibly faster in 64-bit Fedora 18 KDE.
On my X220 with SandyBridge Hardware and an SSD, Fedora 18 is booting faster in my opinion.
I have five systems with Fedora 18 running upgraded from Fedora 17. On none of them the boot time regressed in any noticeable manner. I rather think it got farther, altough I did not measure it.
Just use that and have your system up in less than 10 seconds...
Last edited by kokoko3k; 01-23-2013 at 07:11 AM.
This realy sucks, if it is practicaly slower in Fedora 18 as well.
I have not realy felt the need for a SSD, because Fedora 17 boots realy fast en feels realy responsive for file lookup. For example when I mount a Windows partition, Rhythmbox instantly displays all music that's on that drive, and scrolling and previewing a map full of pictures is so fast that I can't notice any slowdowns using a HDD.
I hope that once I install Fedora 18 on my new (refurbished) desktop with a standard Seagate Baracuda 500GB, this isn't making me downgrade to Fedora 17![]()