Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: The Hawaii Desktop Readies To Dance On Wayland

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,816

    Default The Hawaii Desktop Readies To Dance On Wayland

    Phoronix: The Hawaii Desktop Readies To Dance On Wayland

    With the Green Island Compositor, the Hawaii Desktop is looking to be the very first Wayland-friendly desktop environment for Linux...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTI4ODA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    525

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: The Hawaii Desktop Readies To Dance On Wayland

    With the Green Island Compositor, the Hawaii Desktop is looking to be the very first Wayland-friendly desktop environment for Linux...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTI4ODA
    It's good to see that Wayland is finally getting some love in that regard, all we can hope for now is that the graphics card manufacturers add support for this standard soon, and if not that at least the Nouveau and radeon teams.
    Because software rendering, well, isn't the most speedy thing around. Just ask anyone who has to use LLVMpipe to render 3D compositing on unsupported hardware and you'll see what I mean.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    353

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by intellivision View Post
    Because software rendering, well, isn't the most speedy thing around.
    tell that to the e17 clowns.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Cologne, Germany
    Posts
    308

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by intellivision View Post
    It's good to see that Wayland is finally getting some love in that regard, all we can hope for now is that the graphics card manufacturers add support for this standard soon, and if not that at least the Nouveau and radeon teams.
    Because software rendering, well, isn't the most speedy thing around. Just ask anyone who has to use LLVMpipe to render 3D compositing on unsupported hardware and you'll see what I mean.
    Wayland is not a new X-Server, thus, it only specifies the user-space-tools and does not need to be "re-implemented" by manufacturers, as X still serves as a "back-end".

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,135

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by frign View Post
    Wayland is not a new X-Server, thus, it only specifies the user-space-tools and does not need to be "re-implemented" by manufacturers, as X still serves as a "back-end".
    For now, every distro is going to have Wayland-on-X and it doesn't really matter, but in the long run it would be good to have the ability to run Wayland only without X. The proprietary drivers do need to support it, as Wayland needs access to certain functionality.

    It should be very simple for them to provide, though - the functionality is already there in their drivers, they just have to connect the APIs, and it's much simpler than getting X to work.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Cologne, Germany
    Posts
    308

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smitty3268 View Post
    For now, every distro is going to have Wayland-on-X and it doesn't really matter, but in the long run it would be good to have the ability to run Wayland only without X. The proprietary drivers do need to support it, as Wayland needs access to certain functionality.

    It should be very simple for them to provide, though - the functionality is already there in their drivers, they just have to connect the APIs, and it's much simpler than getting X to work.
    Thanks for carrying it out a bit more; I could not have put it better .

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,404

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by garegin View Post
    tell that to the e17 clowns.
    Not sure of your position, but you do realize that EVAS has tons of backends, including OGL?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smitty3268 View Post
    For now, every distro is going to have Wayland-on-X and it doesn't really matter, but in the long run it would be good to have the ability to run Wayland only without X. The proprietary drivers do need to support it, as Wayland needs access to certain functionality.

    It should be very simple for them to provide, though - the functionality is already there in their drivers, they just have to connect the APIs, and it's much simpler than getting X to work.
    I think "X on wayland" is a better way to put what most distros are planning to go to. Wayland would serve as the system compositor, and any apps that need backwards compatibility would run via a rootless x server running on top of the wayland system compositor (xwayland).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •