Page 8 of 12 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 114

Thread: KDE 4.10 Officially Released With Many Changes

  1. #71
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,762

    Default

    KDE 4.10. How great it is. Plasma is crashing, but KDE doesn't give a flying f*ck because "it's a Qt bug":

    https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311751

    Of course it didn't occur to them to work around the bug. No, they don't do such things. They prefer it when their users are unable to use KDE at all.

    Qt generally doesn't care:

    https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-29082

    They pay more attention to bureaucracy than fixing bugs.

  2. #72
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    318

    Default

    Looks like the nepomuk bug for recursive indexing is fixed now. With the update today it began working with the official version of the package again.
    Last edited by Akka; 02-09-2013 at 09:14 AM.

  3. #73
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    318

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    KDE 4.10. How great it is. Plasma is crashing, but KDE doesn't give a flying f*ck because "it's a Qt bug":

    https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311751

    Of course it didn't occur to them to work around the bug. No, they don't do such things. They prefer it when their users are unable to use KDE at all.

    Qt generally doesn't care:

    https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-29082

    They pay more attention to bureaucracy than fixing bugs.
    Apparently you can get around it if you build the qt core module with CFLAGS -Os

  4. #74
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    21

    Default

    Just installed KDE 4.10 last night. Seems very stable.

  5. #75
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    59

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Akka View Post
    Looks like the nepomuk bug for recursive indexing is fixed now.

    Yes, kinda works now. Unfortunately, results are far from reliable.




  6. #76
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    318

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gedgon View Post
    Yes, kinda works now. Unfortunately, results are far from reliable.



    Maybe I'm slow or something but how do you that conclusion with kfind? It's so many filters on nepmuk in what and where it index that I really don't have any idea how I should interpret the numbers.
    But all files I have tried search for I found at lest.

    //edit I did a comparison of places the file index and the files + folders i got with a * search. I had 10827 files in the register. When I searched i got 8747 + 2076 =10823. 4 hits less than places in the index. I don't now if this is a bug or the 4 places is used to something else? So it really don't say anything
    Last edited by Akka; 02-09-2013 at 07:17 PM.

  7. #77
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    59

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Akka View Post
    Maybe I'm slow or something but how do you that conclusion with kfind? It's so many filters on nepmuk in what and where it index that I really don't have any idea how I should interpret the numbers.
    But all files I have tried search for I found at lest.

    //edit I did a comparison of places the file index and the files + folders i got with a * search. I had 10827 files in the register. When I searched i got 8747 + 2076 =10823. 4 hits less than places in the index. I don't now if this is a bug or the 4 places is used to something else? So it really don't say anything
    Indexed data disk stores ~60 000 files. None of them is hidden/excluded from indexing. Only ~half of them was indexed (level 1). Just for confirmation, Kfind and Dolphin using Nepomuk database had the same task in this example, to find all images. Only kfind did it correctly.

  8. #78
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    318

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gedgon View Post
    Indexed data disk stores ~60 000 files. None of them is hidden/excluded from indexing. Only ~half of them was indexed (level 1). Just for confirmation, Kfind and Dolphin using Nepomuk database had the same task in this example, to find all images. Only kfind did it correctly.
    No I don't think kfind use nepomuk. Not that I tried but I'm almost sure about that kfind use a locate database if you activate the databse function.
    Have you removed all filters from nepomuk and do you index hidden configuration files and son on.
    By the way how do the inotify value affect this?
    Last edited by Akka; 02-09-2013 at 07:51 PM.

  9. #79
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    59

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Akka View Post
    No I don't think kfind use nepomuk.
    Of course not, that's the point.

    Quote Originally Posted by Akka View Post
    Not that I tried but I'm almost sure about that kfind use a locate database if you activate the databse function.
    I wasn't aware of kfind and locate integration, anyway I'm not using locate, so it's acts like frontend to find command.


    Quote Originally Posted by Akka View Post
    Haw you removed all filters from nepomuk and do you index hidden configuration files and son on.
    Yes, like i mentioned earlier.

  10. #80
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    318

    Default

    After tried a little, I don't get nepomuk to index my hidden folders. I don't found any filter alternative about that. The result is that do not find my hidden files and folder. No idea if it a bug or lack of a feature. Maybe that is why you get different result?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •