KDE 4.10 Officially Released With Many Changes

[Akka]

After tried a little, I don't get nepomuk to index my hidden folders. I don't found any filter alternative about that. The result is that do not find my hidden files and folder. No idea if it a bug or lack of a feature. Maybe that is why you get different result?

[gedgon]

After tried a little, I don't get nepomuk to index my hidden folders. I don't found any filter alternative about that. The result is that do not find my hidden files and folder. No idea if it a bug or lack of a feature. Maybe that is why you get different result?

Hidden folders are omitted by default. System Settings -> Desktop Search -> Customize Folders
Hidden files in search result window are probably just hidden Press "Alt + ." in Dolphin.

[Akka]

Hidden folders are omitted by default. System Settings -> Desktop Search -> Customize Folders
Hidden files in search result window are probably just hidden Press "Alt + ." in Dolphin.

What I can see it do not work.
But in the nepomukstrigirc file iI found

index hidden folders=false

4.10 dont use strigi anymore but maybe its same configuration files. If I remove the file it its always recreated at least.

[Adarion]

Uh-oh.
I just read
http://dilfridge.blogspot.de/2013/02...es-and-qt.html

Hmm. Maybe I'll wait with the installation a bit until this has settled.

[dilfridge]

Most likely you're not only missing your hidden folders, but a lot more. Recursive indexing is broken in 4.10.0.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314559

[Akka]

Most likely you're not only missing your hidden folders, but a lot more. Recursive indexing is broken in 4.10.0.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314559

That is fixed and at lest Arch Linux has already shipped the fixes.

[Awesomeness]

Uh-oh.
I just read
http://dilfridge.blogspot.de/2013/02...es-and-qt.html

Hmm. Maybe I'll wait with the installation a bit until this has settled.

“The Qt bug only becomes fatal for some compiler options”.

[Akka]

“The Qt bug only becomes fatal for some compiler options”.

It is a very much about it in the Gentoo forum. I don't almost find the specific problem mentioned anywhere else? Has all the binary dists shipped qt with the right CXXFLAGS? I have not experienced the problem in my arch installation at least and as I understand the pkgbuild arch don't build qt with the Os flag?

[Adarion]

“The Qt bug only becomes fatal for some compiler options”.

The bug seems not to occur if Qt is compiled with CFLAGS="-Os". Cause unknown.

Well, most people likely use -O2 and march=native. It works with -Os wich is normally used only by people on embedded or old Geode CPUs (like me) or VIA C3/C7 (like me). Okay and these are 32bit anyway. But on all other computers (AMD 64) that would probably be a problem. And most (average) people today use an intel or amd on amd64. Gentoo still has KDE SC 4.10 in unstable. maybe that is the reason.

[alexcortes]

...Gentoo still has KDE SC 4.10 in unstable. maybe that is the reason.

Usually, to go stable on Gentoo a package needs to be at least 30 days on testing without any bug report.