Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 115

Thread: BSDs Struggle With Open-Source Graphics Drivers

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by halfmanhalfamazing View Post
    I know why someone would want to run Linux. But why run BSD when it's lagging so far behind at this point? I'm not talking about technical merits, licences, and theoretical this and that. I'm talking reality. Linux is ahead of BSD, technologically and support wise; that is, all these corporate entities (such as Intel, speaking of graphics) are pouring massive amounts of money and resources into Linux. Most OSS users use Linux.

    Actually, if anything, you can say that BSD does quite well in the form of MacOS. But for OSS, Linux has won.
    and yet the Linux based OS's still suck.

  2. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    I think the discussion is more "I want to run BSD when it is not lagging so far behind on graphics, what needs to happen to get there ?".
    Those people are far and few between, which is why companies such as the one you work for aren't putting much resources into it, comparatively.(if at all)

    x/BSD (Mac excluded) finds itself in the same chicken/egg that Linux was in a few years ago. "We need more of x, but we don't have enough users to justify people/businesses investing time/money to make x a reality".

    And given that Linux keeps making advances by leaps/bounds, it attracts users from the x/BSD crowd. Which is a very good thing in the sense that having such a high profile movement(Linux) gets companies such as yours to finally make OSS investments. But it has exascerbated the original chicken/egg scenario on the shoulders of the dwindling x/BSD crowd.

    And here's the worst part of all for the BSD crowd: as Linux gets more and more advanced with more dollars, time, and investments made by various places, the delta between x/BSD and Linux will continue to grow, not shrink. I personally couldn't care, if BSD would've won I'd be a BSD user instead of Linux. But that's not how it happened.

    (by x/BSD I mean Free, Open, Dragonfly, and etc)

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kaprikawn View Post
    Why do you need graphics drivers on BSD?
    Exactly, this guy has a good question. Answer: BSD doesn't need any drivers cause no one but zealots and bigots uses them.

    Isn't BSD for beardy / server stuff?
    Not even that, Linux more for server then BSD is. BSD is for nothing. Really. FUCKING ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

    Genuinely interested in anyone using BSD on desktop machines with a GUI for anything other than 'just because I can...' purposes.
    No one in thier sane mind uses BSD for any purposes. Cause BSD is meanless, shit, useless, HOMO and good for nothing
    Last edited by systemd rulez; 02-08-2013 at 12:58 PM.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brad0 View Post
    and yet the Linux based OS's still suck.
    Suck in what way, BSD fucker? Oh yes, sucks cause it has beaten the shit out of HomoBSD, thats right.

    Man BSDtards are just full of shit.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    I think the discussion is more "I want to run BSD when it is not lagging so far behind on graphics, what needs to happen to get there ?".
    What needs to happen is you need to buy a Mac, then you can have sweet graphics on your BSD system.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    328

    Default

    FFS here we go again... Lol.

    Okay, well, I guess Bridgman had the best comment. *BSD needs to figure out what they can do to be relevant soon. As always you have my respect.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nightmarex View Post
    FFS here we go again... Lol.

    Okay, well, I guess Bridgman had the best comment. *BSD needs to figure out what they can do to be relevant soon. As always you have my respect.
    Funny comment because *BSD is possibly the most popular OS on the planet. The two forks of BSD called "IOS" and "OSX" have a bigger installed base than even Microsoft Windows.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by frantaylor View Post
    Funny comment because *BSD is possibly the most popular OS on the planet. The two forks of BSD called "IOS" and "OSX" have a bigger installed base than even Microsoft Windows.
    Android says hello.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by frantaylor View Post
    Funny comment because *BSD is possibly the most popular OS on the planet. The two forks of BSD called "IOS" and "OSX" have a bigger installed base than even Microsoft Windows.
    1) First, these are not really BSD based. They took some parts from BSDs but not more than that. They have their own kernels, etc.
    2) Ironically, there are no sources. These are proprietary systems. So mumblings of BSD guys about "freedom" is crap. In BSD world either you have to use something wrecked beyond repair or pay to proprietary guys to fix this crap.
    Then proprietary guys will "forget" to share source. So no, you can't have mac os x source (there is Darwin bit ir's very incomplete). And of course no iOS source at all.

    Here we can see simple thing: BSD only allows to gain something to few powerful corporations. Everyone else getting ... cool chance to work for Apple and somesuch. Without any payments. Really cool understanding of freedom!

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by halfmanhalfamazing View Post
    x/BSD (Mac excluded) finds itself in the same chicken/egg that Linux was in a few years ago.
    Ironically, BSDs are 10 years older than any Linux. That's what called EPIC FAIL.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •