Quote Originally Posted by Feared View Post
You're right I don't think it's worth the trouble. I wouldn't mind the code being licensed under MPL 2.0 but If we're talking about licenses worth switching to then I would prefer the FreeBSD or Apache license. Switching from CDDL to MPL to me seems like a good waste of time and effort for little real gain imo.
I think its worth the trouble to switch to something that is GPL compatible. Any GPL compatible license is better than the CDDL. Choosing a GPL incompatible license is usually done to spite GPL software developers (ex. no ZFS for linux).

Licensing code that is GPL incompatible just further fractures the open source community and puts unnecessary restrictions on what code can be combined with what.