Stop writing incoherent bullshit?Your fantasy universe has broken parser, fix your problems first.
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them --Thomas JeffersonHow come you can't counterargument it? Ah, thats because you fit your own definition.
I'm angry because it offends me that morons are allowed to pollute the Internet with lies.I am happy, you are angry; and I crap on microsoft for their actions - that's the state of things.
Your opinion is based on made-up nonsense. Try injecting facts.My opinion is based on raw footprints. I do not base on "opinions".
You can't read a web page.Sorry, I am no pro-microsoft spider.
You know patents can be bought and sold, right? Such as when Microsoft bought many of the original SSL patents from AOL/Netscape? Or OpenGL from SGI?The original claim in this sentence was set by you in terms, that microsoft implemented a lot which I use.
Which is FUD. Which I have proven. So if you mean, I FUD by claiming I am microsoft-free, then sue me for using their "inventions". Until that happens, you carry on proudly with "pro microsoft trojan FUDwriter" medal.
Just because you assert that you don't use any technology "implemented" by Microsoft, doesn't mean you don't use technology which may implement patents owned by Microsoft. Or by anyone else.
I use Windows for games. With Steam for Linux, that requirement is waning.I feel really sorry for you to be forced working on Ubuntu instead of your windows right now.
Oh, I do not, hahaha.
So now I'm a prostitute? Yet I'm the one you want banned for being insulting?Profession is not an accusation. Even if you start working as a prostitute, which you do, I still have no prejudgements against your profession and do not mean to offend you.
Besides, your argumentation *blows hard*, so you do your job very good.
.NET doesn't have DRM, and asserting that it does doesn't change reality..net has DRM, which Silverlight utilizes; that is why Moonlight fails to fill original goal - to be a Second Class Silverlight implementation for non-ms OSes.
Silverlight has DRM, which Moonlight never had access to. But Silverlight is a subset and superset of .NET, and the availability of something in Silverlight does not mean it is in .NET any more than I can say "C++ contains a .doc parser because LibreOffice is mostly written in C++"
Scroll up two lines. You're too stupid to tell the difference between Moonlight and Mono; between Silverlight and .NET.Where did I claimed that? If its hard for you to even read, but easy to swear, maybe you should partner /dev/null as a listener. He always listens every carefully.
I don't think you understand the fable of the scorpion and the frog. Which is a shame, because it supports your argument.Yep, and I am a turtle in that means. Maybe you are a frog, but thats free to use to decide. Anyways, I don't partner scorpions.
Via FUD.No thanks, I consider it my responsibility to clean my street part from plague.
Time to prove you are a liar, then. Thanks for that.It was preinstalled, I tried it, wiped it, forgot it. It was ~300 MiB footprint if exes and dlls for simple notetaking application and music player.
Pristine Ubuntu 11.04 VM. The same version with your "300MB" claim. Updated, but otherwise as shipped, including Mono by default.
Remove Banshee, Tomboy, gBrainy, Gtk#, and Mono, and you remove... 34 meg.
That is why you are not to be trusted. You cannot even bring yourself to argue based on reality. You will lie and lie and lie and lie if you think it helps your position.
It doesn't mean that any more than coding in Java or Python means that. It's just another JITtered bytecode framework. Not special.At least, when somebody uses WINE, he uses it as compatibility layer. As native applications exist, I do not need a preinstalled .net compatibility layer, called MONO.
And coding in MONO is similar crime to coding in winapi+winelib; if you fail to understand what I mean, don't bother.
Weren't you just claiming how much faster Python is that Mono? Are you admitting you lied?CPython is non-optimized, its like comparing old VB to Java.
No. I've had productive discussion with intelligent people whom I respect but disagree with. You are neither. I label the obsessive and insane ones as obsessive and insane. That's not all anti-Mono cultists, but many of them.Ah, common, its getting repetitive.
Do you label everyone who removes MONO and boycotts MS, as "insane and obsessed" "moron"?
How about getting the fuckts first instead?
Or... did people just say "yeah, actually no, fuck off"
Why is it that the anti-Mono cult insists that every single piece of software ever written can have patent claims worked around, except for Mono where a patent claim means everyone in the world gets thrown into mass graves and all software gets shut down? Why the cognitive dissonance?
It's all I can comprehend from half of what you write. "RARARGH RAGHGHGR MICRO$HAFT IS EVILZ! ONLY I AM PURE!"Never used such words. Check your parser, its between your monitor and your chair. Maybe some fresh air will declog it,.. maybe not.
Really?Fine, lets try again.
Firstly, SSL is not patented by MS.
As are lots of things, no matter how you deny it.Secondly, MONO is not safe as its provided on a promise, which has limited scope.
Every single thing listed on the list I previously posted (and you insisted was MSDN) is technology which Microsoft say they may hold patents to (typically via acquisition of those patents, or because the US patent system is so bad that prior art doesn't matter) - and you can use it safe thanks to the same promise they issue as for Mono. Either they're all at risk, or none of them are.
You drink radioactive water and say it's from the finest spring. You're incapable of acknowledging that the situation is muddier than you imagine. Your assertions do not match reality. Microsoft hold thousands of patents, including over things you use, like it or not.I don't build towns on a sleeping nuclear bomb, so I am truly happy and free.