Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 55

Thread: Why I Love AMD and Why You Need To Stop Whining

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    519

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by timothyja View Post
    Generally I like what AMD is doing. I switched from Nvidia in my desktop due to wanting to support a company that was working on open source drivers.
    Erm I think there is a typo in the second sentence...

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    519

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vim_User View Post
    Nonsense. It is AMD's duty to release drivers that actually work and not to rely on patches from third parties.
    And the proprietary drivers work with the distros/graphics cards AMD say they support. Not to mention the FOSS ones...

    @OP
    I've been reading these fora long enough to know you'd still get 3 pages of whining if the AMD logo in the release notes was of a slightly different green colour. Nice attempt, but futile I'm afraid.
    BTW if you don't mind, could you provide some concrete examples on how the OpenGL implementation in fglrx is closer to specs than nvidia's? I've seen those claims a few times, though no real factual data on that. I think it'd help make a good case.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,030

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PsynoKhi0 View Post
    @OP.....
    BTW if you don't mind, could you provide some concrete examples on how the OpenGL implementation in fglrx is closer to specs than nvidia's? I've seen those claims a few times, though no real factual data on that. I think it'd help make a good case.
    I am obviously not an OP, but I want to comment, from what I have heard AMD OpenGL implementation is not closer to specs, but reacts different if program requests something out of specs. I heard that Nvidia will silently "eat" the code or try whatever best it can (think of HTML processing), while AMD will CTD.
    Obviously the AMD approach is only suitable for developer, no customer will be happy about that.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    206

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MWisBest View Post
    I don't get what you're saying. "I've been a long-time fan of AMD processors, but now with mainstream GPUs integrated into the CPU die, I do not want the hassle this would bring." If you have a Sandy Bridge or Ivy Bridge CPU, it most likely has an integrated GPU (I say most likely because I remember there was at least 1 model that didn't have the integrated GPU), and there isn't any hassle with it.
    Exactly, I buy intel CPUs because of the excellent driver support for the built-in IGP.
    Buying an AMD CPU would also mean AMD IGP, and thats something I am not very enthusiastic about.

    Also, Intel's open-source driver is first-class because it's their only driver.
    Sure, but to be honest I don't care whats the reason for their excellent driver, as long as its stable and fast. The 2D performance offered by the intel driver is outstanding.
    I am not a gamer, so the Intel's OpenGL support/performance is good enough for me (heck, I can play steam games on my SNB notebook).

    Regards

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PsynoKhi0 View Post
    And the proprietary drivers work with the distros/graphics cards AMD say they support. Not to mention the FOSS ones...
    Then they should rename their drivers, because as you stated, they only support a few distros, but not Linux in general, so that you can't call it a Linux driver.
    They should call it the Ubuntu/Red Hat/whatever driver then, calling it Linux driver is another lie from AMD.

    It is as simple as I stated in many other posts about AMD: They don't support me and the distro I use, why should I support them? Money goes to Intel/Nvidia next time.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    519

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vim_User View Post
    Then they should rename their drivers, because as you stated, they only support a few distros, but not Linux in general, so that you can't call it a Linux driver.
    They should call it the Ubuntu/Red Hat/whatever driver then, calling it Linux driver is another lie from AMD.

    It is as simple as I stated in many other posts about AMD: They don't support me and the distro I use, why should I support them? Money goes to Intel/Nvidia next time.
    Fine! AMD *officially* supports a predefined set of distros (the words "Pareto principle" come to mind...). The others might require patches. And? Let's nitpick some more while we're at it: Linux is a kernel, not an OS... Are we done yet with all the nonsense?

    Other things you could actually do: maintain a patched FGLRX for your distro, switch distro, have a look at the FOSS drivers, get other AMD owners who use your distro to ask AMD for official support... See? Obviously that requires more effort than bashing that company on a forum, but hey...

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by t.s. View Post
    ..when I'm instaling windows 7/8 on it.

    Same with others. I bought my lappie around time when Llano came out, but still chosed Intel. Don't wanna use something barely usefull (cause I know that I WILL install linux on it). The after-effect? Well, As someone whom others consult when choosing computer, I am almost always recommend Intel. So if someday they want to install linux on theirs, It won't make them cry

    I really wish AMD open driver will someday on par with Intel (on quality)!
    Yeah but that won't free the code!

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Just thought I'd throw in my 2c. You guys have already covered a lot, so I thought I'd throw out some observations.

    Here's why we're whining.

    Using a radeon card in linux is like a bad relationship. We're told of fixes to obvious bugs (poor 2d performance, bad power management, late modern kernel support), and those fixes arrive late or not at all. Don't listen to what people say, look at AMD's actions. They're doing a poor job for anyone interested in high performance graphics in linux, so move on, right? That's not easy for everyone, we don't all have the budget to buy a new graphics card, or worse, a new laptop to replace our current predicament.

    So we whine, because we're in an involuntary relationship with AMD. We have their card and have no practical option to not use it, and AMD doesn't fix bugs that have been resolved for years in their open source drivers, and in nvidia's binary blob.

    I'll be honest and say I haven't watched the fglrx situation since I got a laptop with an nvidia chip. That's ok though, I walked away from this waste of time. It seems to me, that unlike nvidia, all the discussions in the world don't change fglrx. The only thing I've seen move AMD is ubuntu, and even then, they have to throw out beta drivers to support the newest kernels and X servers. If things don't change, watching them support the upcoming ubuntu rolling release repository is going to be like watching a baby drown in a 3ft pool.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PsynoKhi0 View Post
    maintain a patched FGLRX for your distro
    Nope, I won't do the work of AMD developers until they pay me to do their job.I have already paid for their hardware, now I should also spent my time to make it work? Why the hell should I do that?

    switch distro
    I have no problems with my distro, it works fine for me. What does not work fine, because of AMD's shitty driver policy, is the AMD hardware in my machines, so it simply is more logical to switch them out, not the distro.

    have a look at the FOSS drivers
    I am currently using the FOSS driver on my main machine, which means I have to switch to Windows to play a game with decent quality settings. Maybe that is what AMD wants, so that they have to support one OS less? On my other machine using the Foss driver is not an option, it overheats the machine, but since I don't use this machine for beta testing I have the stable version of my distro installed, with an AMD supported kernel (means kernel older than 9 months).

    get other AMD owners who use your distro to ask AMD for official support
    Yeah, of course, AMD limits all they can to save money, but you think they would be officially supporting Slackware. Go back to reality, they are officially supporting Ubuntu, but only as long as you aren't a beta tester, then it is the "Oh, poor boy, you will have to patch the drivers yourself, we are to lazy for that, but maybe you can tell us how it works, so that we can think about implementing it in 2-3 driver versions from now".

    Thanks, but no thanks.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Most of the things have been covered but here are my two cents and on why i moved to nVidia last weeks.

    To get things out in the open, i was running about all my computers AMD all over. Was running AMD on 5970 and then 6970 and also 6370 (laptop).

    Issue 1.
    I'm using 3 monitors so as all of the people in this world we were suffering from the mouse corruption issue that has been on Windows for couple of months but got fixed in 4 driver versions or so. Then the issue came up in Linux and it got never fixed. My bugreport is now about 2 years old almost and my discussions from AMD Tech support had not got me longer other than "we will look into this".

    Issue 2.
    Stability is none on the AMD drivers, In all my Computers using FGLRX i get almost every day a Xorg crash on different hardware and on different distros. My Laptop crashes 40% of the time trying to launch eve online with an Xorg infinte loop or asic hang from fglrx. Same thing on my other computer using 5970 or 6970.

    Issue 3.
    Introduced in Catalyst 12.8 texture issues where almost nothing got rendered in games. That got fixed in 13.2 i think but i never cared since i moved from AMD at this point.

    All in all I never had a proper shutdown with Catalyst on my computer. It always ended with a Xorg crash. Now I have moved to nVidia Zotac 670 AMP and nVidia 620M (Optimus) and not _once_ have Xorg crashed. Also it supports latest kernels and Xorg my Arch Linux so i don't have to create special archived repos for it to stop Xorg from upgrading because AMD is lazy. I'm not saying that nVidia is a walk in the park but at least you get help from their developers (plagman & aplattner) on their forums or @ freenode on #nvidia if you run into issues.

    I'm not telling everyone is having this but this is my experience with AMD and nVidia. Also as a note have anyone seen any representatives from AMD on the Steam Github on their driver issues because i cannot find one.... (but maybe i'm not looking enough)
    I will maybe move back to AMD at some point but looking how AMD handles Linux at this point that will never happen. Opensource? Awesome, but when the blob can barely stand on its crippled legs and the opensource driver support is so sub par in 3D rendering and features, no thank you i had used enough of my free time to track down issues to the fglrx blob.
    Last edited by Commander; 03-18-2013 at 08:03 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •