PC-BSD Rolls Into A Rolling Release Distribution

[Cthulhux]

BSD has been always about being proprietary company's bitch (a lot similiar to a sex slave but BSD loves self harming and degration and so they enjoy it).

Hmm. Well, yes. So which Linux distribution lives without "proprietary company's" donations? Even Debian fails.

[TestingTe]

The BSD fuckers put google up there to fool people into thinking that even open source companies support them.

Google *does* use some FreeBSD coding (albeit not much)

You see, right now AMD GPUs support in FBSD appears to be real crap.

intellivision is right. If you'd been keeping up with Phoronix you'd know that KMS support *is* being worked on for AMD cards.

That said: I have an ATI Mobility Radeon X1300. Performance in FreeBSD is almost as good as it is in GNU/Linux. BUT!! I can still boot into the latest FreeBSD kernel and get full 3d and resolution. If I try in Linux's latest kernel I have to disable KMS to even boot. So I get stuck in VESA

[Vim_User]

Hey, CthuIhux, (the fake one, not the real one), evading the questions and trolling around?
I know that you are somewhat slower than other people when it comes to comprehension and thinking for yourself, so I will repeat it for you:

Is there a valid reason you used an already existing username, slightly modified in a way to resemble the look of the username?

Hey, what is with this one:

essentially most of the BSDs projects are a nothing more then a very bad stand up comedy. For example, thier BSD license

I asked you already in one of your prior incarnations, I think you was the guy with the anal fixation back then, to remove all code with permissive licenses from your systems and look how it works out for you. Have you tried this yet?

Oh, and this one:

extremely bad system design

Show us your expertise, come up with the design flaws in BSD, show us your analysis of the design, not something you have read somewhere on your antiBSD blogs and are now mindlessly repeating.

[0xBADCODE]

http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/donate/sponsors.shtml

I think you're well aware this list is laughable if we'll compare it with Linux. So BSD fanboys are traditionally crying that corporations don't pay enough attention to them. And as for me, there are too much entities I dislike. Proprietary guys who never guives back. Or, for example, DRM f...ks like Netflix. It's so double-standard to give a project some bucks in one hand and then deny access to their own DRMed video service on other hand by using MS-only techs which BSDs cant handle. So BSDs are placed at disadvantage as desktops. Once more. Thank you Netflix, lol! Just as usually, those proprietary nuts are smiling in your face and give some bucks when backstabbing you. Sure, such impressive exercise in double standards is truly worth of epic tales and songs XD. Giving donation while f...g up as desktop is a really impressive combo!

[0xBADCODE]

Oh, and this one:Show us your expertise, come up with the design flaws in BSD

I think market already shown you some. Yet BSD ppl are such a slow and ignorant nuts that they prefer to ignore all feedback and uproar they face. Ironically it turns out to have some consequences and it's not like if BSD guys like them all.

[Vim_User]

I think market already shown you some. Yet BSD ppl are such a slow and ignorant nuts that they prefer to ignore all feedback and uproar they face. Ironically it turns out to have some consequences and it's not like if BSD guys like them all.

Possible, but I would like to see the anals troll come up with something for himself. I would like to see why he thinks he is in a position to judge design decisions and that from a technical point of view.

[Cthulhux]

I think you're well aware this list is laughable if we'll compare it with Linux.

Actually no. I linked the laughable Debian donors list above.

[CthuIhux]

Actually no. I linked the laughable Debian donors list above.

Where, BSD cunt?

[Vim_User]

Where, BSD cunt?

Care to answer the questions directed at you or are you not just a troll but also a coward?

[0xBADCODE]

Actually no. I linked the laughable Debian donors list above.

Debian is merely one of many distros. But there are many more other distros and many powerful entities working on Linux. RedHat now makes over 1B$ on Linux. Needless to say they employ dozens and dozens of dev's who works on Linux and all kinds of things around. And, say, mentioned Debian surely uses at least some of their code. And even if this does not goes to donors lists directly, it saves them really awesome amounts of work, seriously reducing requirements on manpower to get things running. There is Intel which contributes to Linux in many areas. And even greedy nuts like Oracle are commiting to Linux kernel these days. Just because they need Linux and BTRFS too. So they're going to work on it, even if it helps their competitors. They need Linux and Btrfs to offer this stack as boilerplate for their databases (that's where competitors getting out of luck). So even greediest corporation could in fact join their efforts and do some shared work which is somewhat useful for others and reduces amount of work they need to perform to get same things done.

You see, there are many powerful entities which are no longer "donors". They've become members of process at this point. At the end of day, opensource is about cooperation and collaboration, where joint efforts on large-scale task allow to do such task in reasonable time with adequate quality. And that's where exactly BSD guys fail all the time. Corporations consider them as free lunch and do not really integrate into development process or commiting too much code back. So BSD development is slow. BSD guys always lack manpower to do the things. And best of all they do not really care about any troubles of corporations or other users of their OS outside of core team. All this approach had it's price: now BSDs are getting "not so popular" even on servers. You see, to force yahoo or apache to move servers on Linux, BSDs should really lose in many areas. Because it's pain in the rear to change OS on large deployments, re-educate admins, etc. If someone does this, there should be serious advantage from such move. Failure to understand such a simple thing is really silly to my taste.