Page 3 of 15 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 141

Thread: GNOME Will Move Full-Speed With Wayland Support

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    287

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MadsRH View Post
    And they are aiming at spring 2014! Does that mean that if Mir wasn't announced there wouldn't be a usable Wayland display server one year from now? I really do understand why Canonnical couldn't keep on waiting for it to ship.
    Actually we're aiming for September 2013 for a beta release, April 2014 = stable. Though probably a more conservative distribution will maybe wait a little bit more before they change.

    If max 2.000 people at GNOME cannot find any bugs anymore, that does not mean it'll be stable when used by a huge distribution. 1000x the users = discovery of way more bugs. So September 2013 something initial, April 2014 I expect a distribution like Fedora to help out with testing, but conservative distributions probably wait a bit longer (openSUSE, Debian).

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    If KDE pulls the same stunt
    They already stated that their will be no official support as long as Ubuntu is the only distribution that uses Mir (no distro specific patches).
    and Canonical does nothing about it
    What should they do, aim a gun at the developers heads?
    and tries to force me to use Unity
    What should they do, aim a gun at your head?
    than it looks like I'll be on 12.04 for a long time to come
    The only logical conclusion: I don't like the decisions they make, so I stay with them instead of changing to something that supports my aims. /irony

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MadsRH View Post
    And they are aiming at spring 2014! Does that mean that if Mir wasn't announced there wouldn't be a usable Wayland display server one year from now? I really do understand why Canonnical couldn't keep on waiting for it to ship.
    Really?

    This Mir "project" just shows that Cannonical and/or the engineers working for them seem to be incapable to communicate and collaborate with other projects... you know, the things that make open source great in the first place. Hell, it looks like they can't even communicate to their users/community, downgrading them to consumers.

    What if they would have talked to Wayland devs and contributed to it? You might be running Wayland right now instead of sometime next year.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    X.org is and has always been my friend.
    Both Gnome and KDE plan to support both Wayland and X.org in their future releases (in both toolkits and compositors).

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Indore
    Posts
    18

    Default

    great news lokking forward to see gnome

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    507

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vim_User View Post
    The only logical conclusion: I don't like the decisions they make, so I stay with them instead of changing to something that supports my aims. /irony
    You expect people to be logical on Phoronix???

    This is the biggest tinfoil hat wearing group I know!

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nightmarex View Post
    See Mir is a good thing, we should have Wayland adoption in no time now =).
    I was thinking the same thing. Unity Desktop exists partially due to the Gnome team's very odd design choices. Maybe Mir will motivate them to make more Gnome usable and less mousable; give us back all those features they removed.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    287

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zerothis View Post
    I was thinking the same thing. Unity Desktop exists partially due to the Gnome team's very odd design choices. Maybe Mir will motivate them to make more Gnome usable and less mousable; give us back all those features they removed.
    That's odd, because Canonical did the same thing with Unity: Developed it internally, never communicated.

    We had a design hackfest where Canonical did their own meetings.

    So interesting that you seem to have more knowledge about this... care to cite your references?

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    67

    Default

    Canonical wants Ubuntu OS. They want a product that will stand apart from the sea of Linux distros in the eyes of the consumer. They are doing a fine job of distancing themselves from the rest of the pack so far.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,401

    Default

    Regardless of whether you prefer wayland or mir, both are currently lacking a certain amount of what some would call essential functionality in comparison to X. Off the top of my head:
    - Multi-GPU support
    - Hybrid laptop (PowerXpress, Optimus) support
    - modeswitching API
    - multi-display API
    These are obviously not insurmountable, but still a lot of work. Just something to keep in mind.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •