Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 50

Thread: Canonical's Bazaar Still In Stagnant State

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,388

    Default Canonical's Bazaar Still In Stagnant State

    Phoronix: Canonical's Bazaar Still In Stagnant State

    With Canonical allocating its resources elsewhere, the Bazaar revision control system has fallen stagnant...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTMyNzc

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,212

    Default I think mozilla still uses bzr

    They originally picked it because it was more windows friendly than git.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Europe/Moscow
    Posts
    167

    Default

    If the system is finished and working why any more commits? If it's not broken don't fix it.

    Michael is now officially on anti-Canonical vendetta.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    63

    Default

    When you have Git and Mercurial, Bazaar is simply redundant.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,920

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smitty3268 View Post
    They originally picked it because it was more windows friendly than git.
    Do they? I thought Mozilla used mercurial (Could be wrong though)

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ericg View Post
    Do they? I thought Mozilla used mercurial (Could be wrong though)
    Yep. Mozilla uses Mercurial and not Bzr.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    145

    Default

    On related topic, Kiln (from Fog Creek / Stack Overflow guys) announced support for parallel Hg and Git repos. So every repo can be accessed with either Hg or Git clients. Sounds to me like a migration path from Hg to Git for their users.

    http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2013/03/11.html

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Paris, France
    Posts
    5

    Default

    If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by quenlinlom View Post
    If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    In this case it seems to be just "Don't fix it!"
    https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr
    2081 open bugs
    212 high importance bugs

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    34

    Default Not redundant

    Quote Originally Posted by amehaye View Post
    When you have Git and Mercurial, Bazaar is simply redundant.
    Bazaar has some important features:
    - Serverless operation. All you need to make a public repository is an SSH or FTP account. (Hg apparently also has this.)
    - Centralized mode and bound branches. You can still have a centralized repository like in SVN and work in branches on major features, which is actually the most useful model to the vast majority of projects.
    - Commands which are understandable to the average human. Git requires several aliases to approach sensible behavior, encourages partial commits of uncompiled, untested code, and silently commits merges if there are no text conflicts (great recipe for breaking the build). Trying to learn Git commands from the manual is an impossible task. For example, "git push" is describes as "Update remote refs along with associated objects" - what the f*** is this supposed to mean???

    Bazaar is IMO the best tool to use in environments such as scientific programming, where the collaborators are not willing to spend a week learning how to use Git without accidentally destroying their work, and you might have no control over your server.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •