Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: Please ban CthuIhux

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,257

    Default Please ban CthuIhux

    Please ban CthuIhux. It's painfully obvious this is the anti-BSD troll (and probably Vim_User account too): http://phoronix.com/forums/showthrea...ng-For-FreeBSD

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    963

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DanL View Post
    Please ban CthuIhux. It's painfully obvious this is the anti-BSD troll (and probably Vim_User account too): http://phoronix.com/forums/showthrea...ng-For-FreeBSD
    So, if you guys post direct attacks against Linux and GNU/GPL, it is okay.
    If someone tries to hold you off, he should be banned?


    Phoronix would be a far better place, if whole BSD forum tree is removed and you BSD trolls are permbanned. This includes DanL, who already created 3 ban threads (asdx, systemd and Qaridarium) and will sure spawn more.


    Example from my thread:

    http://phoronix.com/forums/showthrea...240#post317240

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    SuperUserLand
    Posts
    528

    Default

    Cleanse phoronix of the filth: Remove all things bsd from here

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pallidus View Post
    Cleanse phoronix of the filth: Remove all things bsd from here
    To clean a forum from filth you usually take the haters out, not the sane people. But let's not be delusioned, those haters just come here to troll for no good reason and michael benefits from them.
    So nothing will happen. think about what it actually says about the quality of a forum (and the mindset of some of the members) that there exists a thread that asks for the a new account of someone banned multiple times already to be banned also and not only nothing happens (not even one response of a moderator), but some people even ask to remove the topics that this troll is using to promote his self-esteem. Next time someone punches you in the face please remove your head, so that it won't happen again, same logic.

    BSD threads on this forum will have the same future than antiBSD trolls have on this forum: nothing will happen, moderation doesn't exist anyways, so just forget it and spew your hate somewhere else, where people might be believe it actually.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,257

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brosis View Post
    Phoronix would be a far better place, if whole BSD forum tree is removed and you BSD trolls are permbanned. This includes DanL, who already created 3 ban threads (asdx, systemd and Qaridarium) and will sure spawn more.
    So you and I agree on that, and yet you want me banned for raising the issue? Interesting logic....

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    963

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DanL View Post
    So you and I agree on that, and yet you want me banned for raising the issue? Interesting logic....
    We differ in that I am okay for others to have other point of view.
    Specifically, the whole BSD topic is correct - those who prefer BSD over GPL to degree they replace working components with equivalents but another license, prove the point they are latent proprietary supporters.
    They are not free / libre software supporters, not in single degree.

    I am ok with that, but when they start post bullcrap about how limiting GPL is, they have to expect counter punch in the face in form of systemd etc.
    So either stop writing nonsense or recieve what you send. If you troll, you will probably be trolled back.

    But when you try to play net police stating I am angel and ctulhux or whatever is a "bad guy", I have huge desire to ban you both.
    I don't consider guy who is essentially trolling back to be breaking any rules, but consider him to be extension of original rule breakage which is tracked to BSD trolls.

    If the root of the problem is not banned, newer and newer "please ban XXXX" will emerge.
    The sole difference between you two is side of the coin - you are both radical.

    Or do you consider banning to be a sign of your final saying and inevitable ultimate culmination of any dispute with you?

    Quote Originally Posted by Vim_User View Post
    To clean a forum from filth you usually take the haters out, not the sane people.
    Thats exactly the method of Joseph Stalin.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    326

    Default I miss Q,

    Ah Q. how I miss your broken English and anti blob rants. Much better reading than the lot of trolls we have these days with the profanity, incoherent ffffffffffffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuu moments and thread hijacking. Yeah, I miss Q.

    Sidenote: I do think there should be some sort of moderator, at least keeping the illusion that this forum isn't just a degenerates playground and cesspool of spite.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brosis View Post
    But when you try to play net police stating I am angel and ctulhux or whatever is a "bad guy", I have huge desire to ban you both.
    In which case you start to play the net police, with DanL as a "bad guy", which should lead you to the desire to ban yourself. Quite ironic, I would think.

    If the root of the problem is not banned, newer and newer "please ban XXXX" will emerge.
    Actually, the root problem of trolling are trolls, not people that don't like trolls.
    Thats exactly the method of Joseph Stalin.
    Actually it is the method of any sane government. Or would you propose it to be a good idea to never speak about drunk driving and put people that mention that something like it exists into prison, instead of putting the real guilty party, drunk drivers, into the prison?
    I strongly recommend to think before writing, otherwise it may be possible that you give evidence for your dumbness.

    Only Linux and GPL are a true Freedom. BSD license and OS are proprietary whores.
    Actually Linux is kernel and the GPL is licence, none of them is freedom. But following your logic, aren't you making yourself a whore with supporting a distribution, if only with using it, with essential parts licensed under BSD or other permissive "proprietary whore" licenses? Or is that just your normal double standard? Well, you could switch to a free/libre distribution, approved by the FSF, and remove those permissive licensed parts, but you would have a hard time posting your bullshit here.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    525

    Default

    If I could add my $0.02, I don't think that degredation of debate should be a bannable offence.
    However, personal attacks, profanity, slander and impersonating other's usernames would be considered grounds to do so, especially for the latter.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    963

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vim_User View Post
    In which case you start to play the net police, with DanL as a "bad guy", which should lead you to the desire to ban yourself. Quite ironic, I would think.
    Nope, do not execute data segment. Stay on topic.

    Quote Originally Posted by Vim_User View Post
    Actually, the root problem of trolling are trolls, not people that don't like trolls.
    The root of the problem are trolls, which get responce from other people. Like BSD trolls. You are BSD troll by the way, hence your opinion is biased.
    Somebody decided to battle them with same weapon, hence appearance of systemd, cthulhux etc. They are response to the problem in form of another problem.

    Quote Originally Posted by Vim_User View Post
    Actually it is the method of any sane government. Or would you propose it to be a good idea to never speak about drunk driving and put people that mention that something like it exists into prison, instead of putting the real guilty party, drunk drivers, into the prison?
    I strongly recommend to think before writing, otherwise it may be possible that you give evidence for your dumbness.
    Exactly, think before writing, follow your own advice. There are many goverment types, those you mentioned is extremely totalitarian and you know what happend to it after war ended and they had no enemy, and hence no bold vector of good/bad to attach crowd to. You are not putting people in prison. Ban means shoot on site; and your own method is similar to Stalin.

    Quote Originally Posted by Vim_User View Post
    Actually Linux is kernel and the GPL is licence, none of them is freedom. But following your logic, aren't you making yourself a whore with supporting a distribution, if only with using it, with essential parts licensed under BSD or other permissive "proprietary whore" licenses? Or is that just your normal double standard? Well, you could switch to a free/libre distribution, approved by the FSF, and remove those permissive licensed parts, but you would have a hard time posting your bullshit here.
    Nice pure troll attempt to push me into offtopic. Instead, you get response below in form of static data which I will not comment or respond to.
    I also highlightened the personal attack, which supports my case of "banning every single BSD troll" (but not BSD user).
    You asked - I answered, over.
    --
    Whore allows everything for money. Definition of BSD. You think its bad, but in fact its neutral - its state of things.
    I think its bad, I don't like girls that do everything for money, I like libre girls that are independent. I support those girls, they have clear goal for the better future.
    Hence I don't use BSD(M). But you want to cover it with flowers of justification based upon fallacies. Nope, you will still have same BSD, you can't change the spirit with decorations.

    But you and other BSD trolls are suddenly offended when I tell the naked truth.
    Instead of covering your falling off "we are open(until we want it so)" camouflage, you begin to attack GPL. Huge mistake, because you point yourself out as freedom hater in disguise.

    You suggest me to use GPL-only. Why? If you would use BSD-only, then your BSD would stop existing 10 years ago. Sure, I am vectored at strong copyleft license for a open and clear reason, and I will switch to software that supports the case if it becomes available. I also support GPL so the software with right goal develops. But if its not available, I use what I have; you must excuse me for not following your own lifestyle of living in a cave and "posting bullshit" with a hammer on walls.
    Last edited by brosis; 03-20-2013 at 08:56 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •